SLMMX vs. SHRAX
SLMMX (Western Asset Massachusetts Municipals Fund) and SHRAX (ClearBridge Aggressive Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - SLMMX is a Municipal Bonds fund managed by Franklin Templeton, while SHRAX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Franklin Templeton. Over the past 10 years, SLMMX returned 1.20%/yr vs 8.19%/yr for SHRAX. At a 0.00 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SLMMX charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.11%/yr for SHRAX.
Performance
SLMMX vs. SHRAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLMMX achieves a 2.17% return, which is significantly lower than SHRAX's 2.52% return. Over the past 10 years, SLMMX has underperformed SHRAX with an annualized return of 1.20%, while SHRAX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.19% annualized return.
SLMMX
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 2.06%
- YTD
- 2.17%
- 6M
- 2.67%
- 1Y
- 8.00%
- 3Y*
- 3.36%
- 5Y*
- 0.11%
- 10Y*
- 1.20%
SHRAX
- 1D
- 1.08%
- 1M
- 3.95%
- YTD
- 2.52%
- 6M
- 0.44%
- 1Y
- 10.73%
- 3Y*
- 12.63%
- 5Y*
- 3.50%
- 10Y*
- 8.19%
SLMMX vs. SHRAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLMMX Western Asset Massachusetts Municipals Fund | 2.17% | 3.76% | 1.22% | 5.51% | -11.55% | 1.73% | 3.31% | 6.85% | 0.02% | 5.10% |
SHRAX ClearBridge Aggressive Growth Fund | 2.52% | 13.50% | 12.02% | 24.09% | -25.43% | 7.35% | 19.74% | 24.26% | -7.93% | 14.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLMMX and SHRAX is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1990 | 0.00 |
The correlation between SLMMX and SHRAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.00 (all time) to 0.17 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLMMX vs. SHRAX — Risk / Return Rank
SLMMX
SHRAX
SLMMX vs. SHRAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Western Asset Massachusetts Municipals Fund (SLMMX) and ClearBridge Aggressive Growth Fund (SHRAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SLMMX | SHRAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.63 | 1.11 | +0.52 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.84 | 0.71 | +2.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.26 | 1.98 | +8.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SLMMX vs. SHRAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLMMX drawdown since its inception was -16.75%, smaller than the maximum SHRAX drawdown of -57.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLMMX and SHRAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLMMX | SHRAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.75% | -57.26% | +40.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.83% | -14.59% | +11.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.79% | -23.73% | +16.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.75% | -33.77% | +17.02% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.75% | -33.77% | +17.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.20% | -2.47% | +2.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.27% | -11.26% | +8.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.78% | 5.23% | -4.45% |
Volatility
SLMMX vs. SHRAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Western Asset Massachusetts Municipals Fund (SLMMX) is 0.90%, while ClearBridge Aggressive Growth Fund (SHRAX) has a volatility of 5.54%. This indicates that SLMMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SHRAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLMMX | SHRAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.90% | 5.54% | -4.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.25% | 13.51% | -11.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.02% | 17.50% | -14.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.53% | 20.94% | -16.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.32% | 20.92% | -16.60% |
SLMMX vs. SHRAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLMMX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than SHRAX's 1.11% expense ratio.
Dividends
SLMMX vs. SHRAX - Dividend Comparison
SLMMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.34%, less than SHRAX's 21.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHRAX ClearBridge Aggressive Growth Fund | 21.73% | 22.27% | 20.39% | 13.77% | 15.63% | 26.11% | 18.42% | 12.71% | 18.97% | 5.97% | 4.76% | 4.03% |
SLMMX Western Asset Massachusetts Municipals Fund | 2.34% | 3.27% | 2.62% | 2.34% | 1.81% | 1.40% | 2.29% | 3.02% | 3.13% | 3.12% | 3.10% | 3.32% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLMMX and SHRAX have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SHRAX has higher volatility (5.54%) compared to SLMMX (0.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLMMX dropped -16.75% vs SHRAX's -57.26%.
SLMMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLMMX and SHRAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer