SLMC.DE vs. IBCJ.DE
SLMC.DE (iShares MSCI Europe ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)) and IBCJ.DE (iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both Europe Equities funds from iShares - SLMC.DE tracks the MSCI Europe ESG Screened while IBCJ.DE tracks the MSCI Poland. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SLMC.DE returned 9.56%/yr vs 14.80%/yr for IBCJ.DE. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SLMC.DE charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for IBCJ.DE.
Performance
SLMC.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLMC.DE achieves a 7.14% return, which is significantly lower than IBCJ.DE's 16.30% return.
SLMC.DE
- 1D
- 0.66%
- 1M
- 3.73%
- YTD
- 7.14%
- 6M
- 9.66%
- 1Y
- 15.51%
- 3Y*
- 13.78%
- 5Y*
- 9.56%
- 10Y*
- —
IBCJ.DE
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 5.66%
- YTD
- 16.30%
- 6M
- 25.77%
- 1Y
- 38.98%
- 3Y*
- 29.89%
- 5Y*
- 14.80%
- 10Y*
- 9.17%
SLMC.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLMC.DE iShares MSCI Europe ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) | 7.14% | 18.79% | 8.99% | 17.54% | -11.33% | 24.92% | -1.75% | 27.93% | -4.14% |
IBCJ.DE iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 16.30% | 53.66% | -0.42% | 43.86% | -21.74% | 14.34% | -18.69% | -3.73% | 6.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLMC.DE and IBCJ.DE is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2018 | 0.59 |
The correlation between SLMC.DE and IBCJ.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLMC.DE vs. IBCJ.DE — Risk / Return Rank
SLMC.DE
IBCJ.DE
SLMC.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Europe ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SLMC.DE) and iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IBCJ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SLMC.DE | IBCJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.50 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.28 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.53 | 3.90 | -2.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.72 | 9.60 | -3.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SLMC.DE | IBCJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.15 | 1.65 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 | 0.55 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.15 | +0.50 |
Drawdowns
SLMC.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLMC.DE drawdown since its inception was -34.92%, smaller than the maximum IBCJ.DE drawdown of -56.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLMC.DE and IBCJ.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLMC.DE | IBCJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.92% | -56.11% | +21.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.10% | -9.96% | -0.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.83% | -18.47% | +1.64% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.92% | -47.31% | +26.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -56.11% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.46% | -1.16% | -0.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.88% | -19.38% | +14.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.71% | 4.05% | -1.34% |
Volatility
SLMC.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Europe ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (SLMC.DE) is 4.40%, while iShares MSCI Poland UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IBCJ.DE) has a volatility of 7.13%. This indicates that SLMC.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBCJ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLMC.DE | IBCJ.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.40% | 7.13% | -2.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.16% | 17.61% | -6.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.44% | 23.48% | -10.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.49% | 26.72% | -12.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.52% | 25.15% | -8.63% |
SLMC.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLMC.DE has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than IBCJ.DE's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
SLMC.DE vs. IBCJ.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither SLMC.DE nor IBCJ.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SLMC.DE and IBCJ.DE have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SLMC.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SLMC.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IBCJ.DE.
SLMC.DE tracks MSCI Europe ESG Screened, while IBCJ.DE tracks MSCI Poland. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for SLMC.DE and 0.74% for IBCJ.DE.
Find the right allocation for SLMC.DE and IBCJ.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer