PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLGFX vs. VITPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SLGFX vs. VITPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Institutional Managed Trust Large Cap Index Fund (SLGFX) and Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VITPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLGFX achieves a 10.44% return, which is significantly lower than VITPX's 11.14% return.


SLGFX

1D
-0.74%
1M
4.06%
YTD
10.44%
6M
10.22%
1Y
26.74%
3Y*
21.78%
5Y*
13.41%
10Y*

VITPX

1D
-0.76%
1M
4.07%
YTD
11.14%
6M
10.88%
1Y
28.14%
3Y*
22.61%
5Y*
13.02%
10Y*
15.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLGFX vs. VITPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SLGFX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Large Cap Index Fund
10.44%16.96%24.07%26.27%-17.23%26.17%20.70%31.07%-7.23%
VITPX
Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares
11.14%17.17%25.43%26.01%-19.48%25.76%20.95%30.87%-7.66%

Correlation

The correlation between SLGFX and VITPX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2018

0.99

The correlation between SLGFX and VITPX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SLGFX vs. VITPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLGFX
SLGFX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
SLGFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLGFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLGFX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
SLGFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLGFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

VITPX
VITPX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
VITPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VITPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
VITPX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
VITPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
VITPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLGFX vs. VITPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Institutional Managed Trust Large Cap Index Fund (SLGFX) and Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VITPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SLGFXVITPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.42

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.03

3.17

-0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.99

14.64

-0.64

SLGFX vs. VITPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLGFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.25, which is comparable to the VITPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLGFX and VITPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SLGFXVITPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.25

2.32

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

0.75

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.50

+0.24

Drawdowns

SLGFX vs. VITPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLGFX drawdown since its inception was -34.56%, smaller than the maximum VITPX drawdown of -55.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLGFX and VITPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SLGFXVITPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.56%

-55.28%

+20.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.90%

-8.92%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.18%

-19.35%

+0.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.24%

-25.31%

+2.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.74%

-0.76%

+0.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.74%

-8.02%

+3.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

1.93%

-0.01%

Volatility

SLGFX vs. VITPX - Volatility Comparison

SEI Institutional Managed Trust Large Cap Index Fund (SLGFX) and Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares (VITPX) have volatilities of 2.95% and 3.05%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SLGFXVITPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.95%

3.05%

-0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.00%

9.20%

-0.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.96%

12.22%

-0.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.25%

17.35%

-0.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.63%

18.41%

+1.22%

SLGFX vs. VITPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLGFX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VITPX's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SLGFX vs. VITPX - Dividend Comparison

SLGFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.98%, more than VITPX's 2.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SLGFX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Large Cap Index Fund
4.98%5.48%4.81%1.26%4.49%1.28%1.21%1.59%2.03%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VITPX
Vanguard Institutional Total Stock Market Index Fund Institutional Plus Shares
2.26%2.64%4.14%2.41%6.48%5.38%11.57%2.91%3.93%1.90%2.80%2.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, SLGFX and VITPX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VITPX has higher volatility (3.05%) compared to SLGFX (2.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLGFX dropped -34.56% vs VITPX's -55.28%.

VITPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 2.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLGFX and VITPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer