PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLGAX vs. QCELX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SLGAX vs. QCELX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Institutional Managed Trust Large Cap Fund (SLGAX) and AQR Large Cap Multi-Style Fund (QCELX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLGAX achieves a 9.95% return, which is significantly lower than QCELX's 18.14% return. Over the past 10 years, SLGAX has underperformed QCELX with an annualized return of 12.80%, while QCELX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.84% annualized return.


SLGAX

1D
1.05%
1M
0.75%
6M
8.72%
YTD
9.95%
1Y
20.59%
3Y*
17.34%
5Y*
10.47%
10Y*
12.80%
ALL TIME*
12.49%

QCELX

1D
1.24%
1M
1.62%
6M
14.89%
YTD
18.14%
1Y
32.89%
3Y*
23.69%
5Y*
15.42%
10Y*
14.84%
ALL TIME*
12.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

SLGAX vs. QCELX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SLGAX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Large Cap Fund
9.95%17.41%20.38%19.49%-16.03%24.30%11.60%29.13%-6.92%22.54%
QCELX
AQR Large Cap Multi-Style Fund
18.14%23.38%22.73%26.30%-15.73%27.18%14.93%24.33%-10.96%22.73%

Correlation

The correlation between SLGAX and QCELX is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014

0.96

The correlation between SLGAX and QCELX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SLGAX vs. QCELX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SLGAX
SLGAX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
SLGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
SLGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

QCELX
QCELX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
QCELX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QCELX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
QCELX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
QCELX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
QCELX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SLGAX vs. QCELX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Institutional Managed Trust Large Cap Fund (SLGAX) and AQR Large Cap Multi-Style Fund (QCELX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SLGAXQCELXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.40

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.26

3.84

-1.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.86

16.20

-6.35

SLGAX vs. QCELX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLGAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is lower than the QCELX Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLGAX and QCELX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SLGAX vs. QCELX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLGAX drawdown since its inception was -36.80%, which is greater than QCELX's maximum drawdown of -33.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLGAX and QCELX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SLGAXQCELXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.80%

-33.52%

-3.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.39%

-7.92%

-0.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.89%

-18.38%

-10.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.89%

-28.70%

-0.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.80%

-33.52%

-3.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.32%

-0.29%

-0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.84%

-5.60%

+0.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

1.87%

+0.05%

Volatility

SLGAX vs. QCELX - Volatility Comparison

SEI Institutional Managed Trust Large Cap Fund (SLGAX) and AQR Large Cap Multi-Style Fund (QCELX) have volatilities of 3.00% and 3.02%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SLGAXQCELXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.00%

3.02%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.38%

10.07%

-0.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.13%

13.41%

-1.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.62%

18.99%

+0.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.62%

18.96%

+0.66%

SLGAX vs. QCELX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLGAX has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than QCELX's 0.41% expense ratio.


Dividends

SLGAX vs. QCELX - Dividend Comparison

SLGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.03%, more than QCELX's 12.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QCELX
AQR Large Cap Multi-Style Fund
12.19%14.40%12.89%13.67%11.05%12.41%9.94%5.36%7.81%0.99%1.28%0.89%
SLGAX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Large Cap Fund
19.03%20.96%18.18%6.78%10.41%14.16%3.68%7.27%16.21%7.35%0.94%20.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, SLGAX and QCELX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

QCELX has higher volatility (3.02%) compared to SLGAX (3.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLGAX dropped -36.80% vs QCELX's -33.52%.

QCELX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLGAX and QCELX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer