PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
SLF.AX vs. SFY.AX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

SLF.AX vs. SFY.AX

Last updated Jul 16, 2026
Documentation

SLF.AX (SPDR ETFs Australia - State Street SPDR S&P/ASX 200 Listed Property ETF) and SFY.AX (SPDR ETFs Australia - State Street SPDR S&P/ASX 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SLF.AX is a REIT fund tracking the SPDR Index, while SFY.AX is a Global Equities fund tracking the SPDR Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SLF.AX returned 7.08%/yr vs 8.93%/yr for SFY.AX. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.

Performance

SLF.AX vs. SFY.AX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a A$10,000 investment in SPDR ETFs Australia - State Street SPDR S&P/ASX 200 Listed Property ETF (SLF.AX) and SPDR ETFs Australia - State Street SPDR S&P/ASX 50 ETF (SFY.AX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLF.AX achieves a -7.90% return, which is significantly lower than SFY.AX's 5.64% return. Over the past 10 years, SLF.AX has underperformed SFY.AX with an annualized return of 7.08%, while SFY.AX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.93% annualized return.

SLF.AX

1D
0.00%
1M
-4.92%
6M
-7.36%
YTD
-7.90%
1Y
-5.99%
3Y*
9.40%
5Y*
6.74%
10Y*
7.08%

SFY.AX

1D
0.16%
1M
-0.09%
6M
5.09%
YTD
5.64%
1Y
5.96%
3Y*
10.63%
5Y*
8.17%
10Y*
8.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLF.AX vs. SFY.AX - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SLF.AX
SPDR ETFs Australia - State Street SPDR S&P/ASX 200 Listed Property ETF		-7.90%8.02%19.77%21.15%-17.73%28.03%0.02%22.20%7.29%6.80%
SFY.AX
SPDR ETFs Australia - State Street SPDR S&P/ASX 50 ETF		5.64%7.36%11.46%12.65%1.60%16.17%-1.66%24.22%-1.86%9.06%

Correlation

The correlation between SLF.AX and SFY.AX is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 19, 2006

0.51

The correlation between SLF.AX and SFY.AX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

SPDR ETFs Australia - State Street SPDR S&P/ASX 200 Listed Property ETF

SPDR ETFs Australia - State Street SPDR S&P/ASX 50 ETF

Return for Risk

SLF.AX vs. SFY.AX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
SLF.AX
SLF.AX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
SLF.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLF.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLF.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
SLF.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLF.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
SFY.AX
SFY.AX Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
SFY.AX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SFY.AX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
SFY.AX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
SFY.AX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
SFY.AX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLF.AX vs. SFY.AX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR ETFs Australia - State Street SPDR S&P/ASX 200 Listed Property ETF (SLF.AX) and SPDR ETFs Australia - State Street SPDR S&P/ASX 50 ETF (SFY.AX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

SLF.AXSFY.AXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
-0.31
0.57

-0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
-0.30
0.91

-1.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.11

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.26

0.97

-1.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.54

2.05

-2.59

SLF.AX vs. SFY.AX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLF.AX Sharpe Ratio is -0.31, which is lower than the SFY.AX Sharpe Ratio of 0.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLF.AX and SFY.AX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SLF.AX vs. SFY.AX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLF.AX drawdown since its inception was -75.42%, which is greater than SFY.AX's maximum drawdown of -48.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLF.AX and SFY.AX.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

SLF.AXSFY.AXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.42%

-48.20%

-27.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-22.29%

-7.39%

-14.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.29%

-12.86%

-9.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.42%

-14.21%

-14.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.10%

-32.98%

-16.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.47%

-1.63%

-11.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.75%

-9.33%

-15.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.71%

3.53%

+7.18%

Volatility

SLF.AX vs. SFY.AX - Volatility Comparison

SPDR ETFs Australia - State Street SPDR S&P/ASX 200 Listed Property ETF (SLF.AX) has a higher volatility of 4.26% compared to SPDR ETFs Australia - State Street SPDR S&P/ASX 50 ETF (SFY.AX) at 2.61%. This indicates that SLF.AX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SFY.AX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

SLF.AXSFY.AXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.26%

2.61%

+1.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.25%

9.82%

+5.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.68%

12.67%

+6.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.32%

12.78%

+7.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.58%

14.65%

+7.93%

Dividends

SLF.AX vs. SFY.AX - Dividend Comparison

SLF.AX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.96%, more than SFY.AX's 3.85% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SFY.AX
SPDR ETFs Australia - State Street SPDR S&P/ASX 50 ETF		3.85%3.60%4.04%4.16%6.09%3.95%2.73%4.85%5.07%4.60%4.82%4.34%
SLF.AX
SPDR ETFs Australia - State Street SPDR S&P/ASX 200 Listed Property ETF		4.96%4.33%4.15%11.34%11.20%7.47%9.34%8.99%13.05%5.78%3.81%3.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

SLF.AX and SFY.AX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLF.AX is categorized as REIT, while SFY.AX is Global Equities. Both ETFs track SPDR Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLF.AX and SFY.AX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer