PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLF-PC.TO vs. BCE.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SLF-PC.TO vs. BCE.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Sun Life Financial Inc. (SLF-PC.TO) and BCE Inc. (BCE.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLF-PC.TO achieves a 3.86% return, which is significantly higher than BCE.TO's -4.73% return. Over the past 10 years, SLF-PC.TO has outperformed BCE.TO with an annualized return of 5.16%, while BCE.TO has yielded a comparatively lower -1.12% annualized return.


SLF-PC.TO

1D
0.64%
1M
1.98%
6M
3.53%
YTD
3.86%
1Y
8.99%
3Y*
13.98%
5Y*
3.00%
10Y*
5.16%
ALL TIME*
4.79%

BCE.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
0.46%
6M
-11.39%
YTD
-4.73%
1Y
-1.53%
3Y*
-12.58%
5Y*
-7.32%
10Y*
-1.12%
ALL TIME*
6.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)

BCE.TO

BCE Inc.
CA$130.32MCA$129.72MCA$153.36M
CA$89.30KCA$72.12KCA$77.55K

SLF-PC.TO vs. BCE.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SLF-PC.TO
Sun Life Financial Inc.
3.86%14.44%16.24%6.11%-22.44%7.96%19.50%11.98%-1.98%6.52%
BCE.TO
BCE Inc.
-4.73%5.35%-30.02%-6.22%-4.33%27.90%-3.92%17.38%-5.65%9.18%

Correlation

The correlation between SLF-PC.TO and BCE.TO is 0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 28, 2006

0.10

The correlation between SLF-PC.TO and BCE.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (1 year) to 0.13 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SLF-PC.TO vs. BCE.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SLF-PC.TO
SLF-PC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
SLF-PC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLF-PC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLF-PC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
SLF-PC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLF-PC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

BCE.TO
BCE.TO Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
BCE.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCE.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCE.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
BCE.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCE.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SLF-PC.TO vs. BCE.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sun Life Financial Inc. (SLF-PC.TO) and BCE Inc. (BCE.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SLF-PC.TOBCE.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.01

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.15

-0.06

+1.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.43

-0.13

+3.56

SLF-PC.TO vs. BCE.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLF-PC.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.69, which is higher than the BCE.TO Sharpe Ratio of -0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLF-PC.TO and BCE.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SLF-PC.TO vs. BCE.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLF-PC.TO drawdown since its inception was -46.37%, smaller than the maximum BCE.TO drawdown of -50.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLF-PC.TO and BCE.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SLF-PC.TOBCE.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.37%

-50.02%

+3.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.55%

-15.69%

+9.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.64%

-41.08%

+32.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.76%

-50.02%

+21.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.23%

-50.02%

+15.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.54%

-44.51%

+43.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.59%

-11.70%

+4.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.19%

7.12%

-4.93%

Volatility

SLF-PC.TO vs. BCE.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sun Life Financial Inc. (SLF-PC.TO) is 3.58%, while BCE Inc. (BCE.TO) has a volatility of 7.20%. This indicates that SLF-PC.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BCE.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SLF-PC.TOBCE.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.58%

7.20%

-3.62%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.83%

14.06%

-6.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.83%

18.24%

-7.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.98%

17.56%

-4.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.20%

17.69%

-2.49%

Dividends

SLF-PC.TO vs. BCE.TO - Dividend Comparison

SLF-PC.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.02%, less than BCE.TO's 5.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BCE.TO
BCE Inc.
5.75%7.06%11.97%7.42%6.19%5.32%6.12%5.27%5.60%4.75%4.70%4.86%
SLF-PC.TO
Sun Life Financial Inc.
5.02%5.09%5.52%6.07%6.06%4.45%4.59%5.21%5.53%5.14%5.21%5.32%

Financials

SLF-PC.TO vs. BCE.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sun Life Financial Inc. and BCE Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in CAD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


SLF-PC.TO and BCE.TO have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLF-PC.TO and BCE.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer