PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SLCGX vs. VPMCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SLCGX vs. VPMCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Saratoga Large Capitalization Growth Portfolio (SLCGX) and Vanguard PRIMECAP Fund Investor Shares (VPMCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SLCGX achieves a 3.44% return, which is significantly lower than VPMCX's 25.40% return. Over the past 10 years, SLCGX has outperformed VPMCX with an annualized return of 19.62%, while VPMCX has yielded a comparatively lower 17.57% annualized return.


SLCGX

1D
-0.68%
1M
7.26%
YTD
3.44%
6M
4.29%
1Y
21.04%
3Y*
27.15%
5Y*
16.65%
10Y*
19.62%

VPMCX

1D
0.35%
1M
12.86%
YTD
25.40%
6M
26.79%
1Y
58.79%
3Y*
28.00%
5Y*
16.44%
10Y*
17.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SLCGX vs. VPMCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SLCGX
Saratoga Large Capitalization Growth Portfolio
3.44%22.74%40.67%38.79%-28.77%32.60%28.67%51.18%-0.28%30.32%
VPMCX
Vanguard PRIMECAP Fund Investor Shares
25.40%29.60%13.23%28.16%-15.22%21.64%17.16%27.78%-1.99%28.17%

Correlation

The correlation between SLCGX and VPMCX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 1995

0.89

The correlation between SLCGX and VPMCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SLCGX vs. VPMCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SLCGX
SLCGX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
SLCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
SLCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

VPMCX
VPMCX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
VPMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VPMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
VPMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
VPMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
VPMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SLCGX vs. VPMCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Saratoga Large Capitalization Growth Portfolio (SLCGX) and Vanguard PRIMECAP Fund Investor Shares (VPMCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SLCGXVPMCXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.32

3.75

-2.43

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.81

5.04

-3.23

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.65

-0.42

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.21

5.12

-3.91

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.73

23.59

-19.86

SLCGX vs. VPMCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SLCGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is lower than the VPMCX Sharpe Ratio of 3.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SLCGX and VPMCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SLCGXVPMCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.32

3.75

-2.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

0.91

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

0.92

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.50

0.81

-0.30

Drawdowns

SLCGX vs. VPMCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SLCGX drawdown since its inception was -71.04%, which is greater than VPMCX's maximum drawdown of -50.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLCGX and VPMCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SLCGXVPMCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.04%

-50.45%

-20.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.18%

-11.73%

-6.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.17%

-20.56%

-3.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.13%

-25.25%

-5.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.16%

-32.65%

+1.49%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.68%

0.00%

-0.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.91%

-7.41%

-15.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.87%

2.54%

+3.33%

Volatility

SLCGX vs. VPMCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Saratoga Large Capitalization Growth Portfolio (SLCGX) is 3.65%, while Vanguard PRIMECAP Fund Investor Shares (VPMCX) has a volatility of 6.18%. This indicates that SLCGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VPMCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SLCGXVPMCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.65%

6.18%

-2.53%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.54%

12.85%

-0.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.65%

16.02%

+0.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.67%

18.26%

+3.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.02%

19.19%

+2.83%

SLCGX vs. VPMCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SLCGX has a 1.34% expense ratio, which is higher than VPMCX's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

SLCGX vs. VPMCX - Dividend Comparison

SLCGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.37%, more than VPMCX's 13.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SLCGX
Saratoga Large Capitalization Growth Portfolio
13.37%13.83%23.77%7.53%7.55%23.16%8.91%31.50%25.22%5.81%23.83%10.21%
VPMCX
Vanguard PRIMECAP Fund Investor Shares
13.04%16.36%6.62%7.16%9.85%10.08%9.74%7.15%8.32%4.53%5.05%5.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


SLCGX and VPMCX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VPMCX has higher volatility (6.18%) compared to SLCGX (3.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLCGX dropped -71.04% vs VPMCX's -50.45%.

VPMCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.75 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SLCGX and VPMCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer