SLASX vs. YFSIX
SLASX (Selected American Shares Fund) and YFSIX (AMG Yacktman Global Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, SLASX returned 10.75%/yr vs 8.58%/yr for YFSIX. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SLASX charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for YFSIX.
Performance
SLASX vs. YFSIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SLASX achieves a 11.96% return, which is significantly lower than YFSIX's 26.70% return.
SLASX
- 1D
- 1.05%
- 1M
- 0.68%
- YTD
- 11.96%
- 6M
- 13.79%
- 1Y
- 34.56%
- 3Y*
- 24.93%
- 5Y*
- 10.75%
- 10Y*
- 13.32%
YFSIX
- 1D
- -1.20%
- 1M
- 1.33%
- YTD
- 26.70%
- 6M
- 12.89%
- 1Y
- 28.37%
- 3Y*
- 17.38%
- 5Y*
- 8.58%
- 10Y*
- —
SLASX vs. YFSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLASX Selected American Shares Fund | 11.96% | 26.72% | 17.60% | 32.47% | -20.33% | 17.71% | 11.61% | 31.20% | -13.96% | 19.46% |
YFSIX AMG Yacktman Global Fund | 26.70% | 14.91% | -0.34% | 16.64% | -9.15% | 13.13% | 18.46% | 24.40% | 2.18% | 20.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between SLASX and YFSIX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2017 | 0.71 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SLASX and YFSIX has dropped to 0.44 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SLASX vs. YFSIX — Risk / Return Rank
SLASX
YFSIX
SLASX vs. YFSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Selected American Shares Fund (SLASX) and AMG Yacktman Global Fund (YFSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SLASX | YFSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.35 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.26 | 2.14 | +2.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.67 | 6.77 | +9.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SLASX | YFSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.71 | 1.42 | +1.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.56 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.81 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
SLASX vs. YFSIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SLASX drawdown since its inception was -58.43%, which is greater than YFSIX's maximum drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SLASX and YFSIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SLASX | YFSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.43% | -35.10% | -23.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.14% | -14.20% | +6.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.14% | -14.20% | -7.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.55% | -25.14% | -6.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.59% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.20% | +1.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.18% | -4.89% | -3.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.07% | 4.47% | -2.40% |
Volatility
SLASX vs. YFSIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Selected American Shares Fund (SLASX) is 3.01%, while AMG Yacktman Global Fund (YFSIX) has a volatility of 5.77%. This indicates that SLASX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than YFSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SLASX | YFSIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.01% | 5.77% | -2.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.03% | 20.79% | -11.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.77% | 21.37% | -8.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.97% | 15.39% | +4.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.17% | 16.25% | +3.92% |
SLASX vs. YFSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SLASX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than YFSIX's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
SLASX vs. YFSIX - Dividend Comparison
SLASX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.33%, while YFSIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SLASX Selected American Shares Fund | 10.33% | 11.56% | 20.21% | 7.72% | 7.85% | 12.55% | 2.76% | 5.06% | 18.16% | 7.01% | 14.99% | 21.13% |
YFSIX AMG Yacktman Global Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.68% | 8.02% | 4.32% | 8.18% | 4.76% | 6.59% | 0.71% | 2.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SLASX and YFSIX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
YFSIX has higher volatility (5.77%) compared to SLASX (3.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SLASX dropped -58.43% vs YFSIX's -35.10%.
SLASX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SLASX and YFSIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer