SKYY vs. IGM
SKYY (First Trust ISE Cloud Computing Index Fund) and IGM (iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - SKYY tracks the ISE Cloud Computing Index while IGM tracks the S&P North American Expanded Technology Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SKYY returned 16.26%/yr vs 24.57%/yr for IGM. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SKYY charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for IGM.
Performance
SKYY vs. IGM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SKYY achieves a 3.03% return, which is significantly lower than IGM's 23.42% return. Over the past 10 years, SKYY has underperformed IGM with an annualized return of 16.26%, while IGM has yielded a comparatively higher 24.57% annualized return.
SKYY
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 6.69%
- YTD
- 3.03%
- 6M
- 1.79%
- 1Y
- 13.95%
- 3Y*
- 20.38%
- 5Y*
- 5.69%
- 10Y*
- 16.26%
IGM
- 1D
- 0.69%
- 1M
- 3.04%
- YTD
- 23.42%
- 6M
- 23.24%
- 1Y
- 48.57%
- 3Y*
- 35.37%
- 5Y*
- 20.09%
- 10Y*
- 24.57%
SKYY vs. IGM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SKYY First Trust ISE Cloud Computing Index Fund | 3.03% | 9.20% | 35.87% | 52.18% | -44.68% | 10.62% | 57.77% | 25.25% | 6.01% | 33.47% |
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | 23.42% | 26.76% | 36.99% | 60.68% | -35.83% | 25.72% | 45.11% | 41.81% | 2.26% | 37.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between SKYY and IGM is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2011 | 0.88 |
The correlation between SKYY and IGM shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.88 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
SKYY vs. IGM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SKYY
IGM
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
SKYY
IGM
Communication Services
SKYY
IGM
Consumer Cyclical
SKYY
IGM
Healthcare
SKYY
IGM
-
Industrials
SKYY
IGM
Basic Materials
SKYY
-
IGM
-
Consumer Defensive
SKYY
-
IGM
-
Energy
SKYY
-
IGM
Financial Services
SKYY
-
IGM
Real Estate
SKYY
-
IGM
-
Utilities
SKYY
-
IGM
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SKYY vs. IGM — Risk / Return Rank
SKYY
IGM
SKYY vs. IGM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust ISE Cloud Computing Index Fund (SKYY) and iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SKYY | IGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.90 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.37 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.51 | 2.97 | -2.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.13 | 10.06 | -8.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SKYY vs. IGM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SKYY drawdown since its inception was -53.20%, smaller than the maximum IGM drawdown of -65.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SKYY and IGM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SKYY | IGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.20% | -65.59% | +12.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.39% | -16.44% | -10.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.80% | -26.39% | -5.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.20% | -40.68% | -12.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.20% | -40.68% | -12.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.63% | -6.80% | -6.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.90% | -15.22% | +4.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.34% | 4.84% | +7.50% |
Volatility
SKYY vs. IGM - Volatility Comparison
First Trust ISE Cloud Computing Index Fund (SKYY) has a higher volatility of 13.09% compared to iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF (IGM) at 10.03%. This indicates that SKYY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SKYY | IGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.09% | 10.03% | +3.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.88% | 18.11% | +5.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.45% | 21.98% | +6.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.67% | 25.91% | +4.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 26.90% | 24.66% | +2.24% |
SKYY vs. IGM - Expense Ratio Comparison
SKYY has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than IGM's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
SKYY vs. IGM - Dividend Comparison
SKYY has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IGM iShares Expanded Tech Sector ETF | 0.13% | 0.17% | 0.22% | 0.33% | 0.66% | 0.16% | 0.32% | 0.50% | 0.57% | 0.57% | 0.90% | 0.79% |
SKYY First Trust ISE Cloud Computing Index Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.23% | 0.78% | 0.17% | 0.54% | 0.37% | 0.27% | 0.35% | 0.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SKYY and IGM have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SKYY has higher volatility (13.09%) compared to IGM (10.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SKYY dropped -53.20% vs IGM's -65.59%.
On 10-year performance, IGM leads with 24.57% vs 16.26% for SKYY. On fees, IGM is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, IGM has been the lower-risk option at 10.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IGM has performed better with a 24.57% return vs 16.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IGM is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SKYY.
IGM has the higher dividend yield at 0.13%, compared with 0.00% for SKYY.
SKYY tracks ISE Cloud Computing Index, while IGM tracks S&P North American Expanded Technology Sector Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SKYY and 0.39% for IGM.
IGM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SKYY and IGM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer