PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SKYE.AS vs. AINF.AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SKYE.AS vs. AINF.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in First Trust Cloud Computing UCITS ETF (SKYE.AS) and iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (AINF.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SKYE.AS is traded in EUR, while AINF.AS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the AINF.AS values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SKYE.AS achieves a 14.60% return, which is significantly lower than AINF.AS's 62.06% return.


SKYE.AS

1D
-2.66%
1M
18.07%
YTD
14.60%
6M
14.82%
1Y
24.91%
3Y*
22.17%
5Y*
9.52%
10Y*

AINF.AS

1D
0.34%
1M
28.54%
YTD
62.06%
6M
62.39%
1Y
119.64%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SKYE.AS vs. AINF.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
SKYE.AS
First Trust Cloud Computing UCITS ETF
14.60%-3.90%-4.60%
AINF.AS
iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
62.06%27.53%0.59%

Correlation

The correlation between SKYE.AS and AINF.AS is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2024

0.72

The correlation between SKYE.AS and AINF.AS shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.72 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SKYE.AS vs. AINF.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SKYE.AS
SKYE.AS Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
SKYE.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SKYE.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
SKYE.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
SKYE.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
SKYE.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

AINF.AS
AINF.AS Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
AINF.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AINF.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
AINF.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
AINF.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
AINF.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SKYE.AS vs. AINF.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Cloud Computing UCITS ETF (SKYE.AS) and iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (AINF.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SKYE.ASAINF.ASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.72

-0.55

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.88

10.14

-9.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.95

33.57

-31.62

SKYE.AS vs. AINF.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SKYE.AS Sharpe Ratio is 0.87, which is lower than the AINF.AS Sharpe Ratio of 4.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SKYE.AS and AINF.AS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SKYE.ASAINF.ASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.87

4.77

-3.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

2.24

-1.73

Drawdowns

SKYE.AS vs. AINF.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SKYE.AS drawdown since its inception was -49.60%, which is greater than AINF.AS's maximum drawdown of -30.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SKYE.AS and AINF.AS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SKYE.ASAINF.ASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.60%

-30.52%

-19.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.79%

-11.60%

-16.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.17%

0.00%

-3.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.18%

-5.72%

-11.46%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.71%

3.52%

+9.19%

Volatility

SKYE.AS vs. AINF.AS - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Cloud Computing UCITS ETF (SKYE.AS) has a higher volatility of 11.76% compared to iShares AI Infrastructure UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (AINF.AS) at 9.07%. This indicates that SKYE.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AINF.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SKYE.ASAINF.ASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.76%

9.07%

+2.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.77%

18.68%

+5.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.45%

24.72%

+3.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.97%

28.40%

+0.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.82%

28.40%

+0.42%

SKYE.AS vs. AINF.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SKYE.AS has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than AINF.AS's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

SKYE.AS vs. AINF.AS - Dividend Comparison

Neither SKYE.AS nor AINF.AS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SKYE.AS and AINF.AS have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, AINF.AS is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

AINF.AS is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SKYE.AS.

SKYE.AS tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD, while AINF.AS tracks STOXX Global AI Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SKYE.AS and 0.35% for AINF.AS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SKYE.AS and AINF.AS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer