SKRE vs. MAGO
SKRE (Tuttle Capital Daily 2X Inverse Regional Banks ETF) and MAGO (Tuttle Capital Magnificent 7 Income Blast ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SKRE is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the S&P Regional Banks Select Industry, while MAGO is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by Tuttle. SKRE is passively managed, while MAGO is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.24, they often move in opposite directions. SKRE charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for MAGO.
Performance
SKRE vs. MAGO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SKRE achieves a -14.51% return, which is significantly lower than MAGO's 3.00% return.
SKRE
- 1D
- 4.58%
- 1M
- 2.45%
- YTD
- -14.51%
- 6M
- -16.27%
- 1Y
- -39.81%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MAGO
- 1D
- -1.35%
- 1M
- 2.78%
- YTD
- 3.00%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SKRE vs. MAGO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SKRE Tuttle Capital Daily 2X Inverse Regional Banks ETF | -14.51% | 1.83% |
MAGO Tuttle Capital Magnificent 7 Income Blast ETF | 3.00% | -0.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between SKRE and MAGO is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 31, 2025 | -0.24 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SKRE vs. MAGO — Risk / Return Rank
SKRE
MAGO
SKRE vs. MAGO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tuttle Capital Daily 2X Inverse Regional Banks ETF (SKRE) and Tuttle Capital Magnificent 7 Income Blast ETF (MAGO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SKRE | MAGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.85 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.18 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.86 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.81 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.22 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SKRE | MAGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.85 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.67 | 0.26 | -0.93 |
Drawdowns
SKRE vs. MAGO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SKRE drawdown since its inception was -75.30%, which is greater than MAGO's maximum drawdown of -17.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SKRE and MAGO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SKRE | MAGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -75.30% | -17.98% | -57.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.06% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -72.27% | -4.03% | -68.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.26% | -5.18% | -42.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 32.67% | — | — |
Volatility
SKRE vs. MAGO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SKRE | MAGO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.32% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.62% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.92% | 22.57% | +24.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.73% | 22.57% | +33.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 55.73% | 22.57% | +33.16% |
SKRE vs. MAGO - Expense Ratio Comparison
SKRE has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than MAGO's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
SKRE vs. MAGO - Dividend Comparison
SKRE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.30%, less than MAGO's 6.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
MAGO Tuttle Capital Magnificent 7 Income Blast ETF | 6.39% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SKRE Tuttle Capital Daily 2X Inverse Regional Banks ETF | 0.30% | 0.26% | 3.16% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SKRE and MAGO have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SKRE is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SKRE is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for MAGO.
MAGO has the higher dividend yield at 6.39%, compared with 0.30% for SKRE.
SKRE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while MAGO is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SKRE and 0.99% for MAGO.
Find the right allocation for SKRE and MAGO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer