SJNK vs. IBHD
SJNK (SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term High Yield Bond ETF) and IBHD (iShares iBonds 2024 Term High Yield & Income ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds - SJNK tracks the Bloomberg US High Yield 350mn Cash Pay 2% Capped (0-5 Y) while IBHD tracks the Bloomberg 2024 Term High Yield and Income Index. Both are passively managed. SJNK charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for IBHD.
Performance
SJNK vs. IBHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SJNK
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 0.37%
- YTD
- 1.41%
- 6M
- 1.87%
- 1Y
- 6.45%
- 3Y*
- 8.21%
- 5Y*
- 4.84%
- 10Y*
- 5.51%
IBHD
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SJNK vs. IBHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SJNK SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term High Yield Bond ETF | 0.89% |
IBHD iShares iBonds 2024 Term High Yield & Income ETF | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SJNK vs. IBHD — Risk / Return Rank
SJNK
IBHD
SJNK vs. IBHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term High Yield Bond ETF (SJNK) and iShares iBonds 2024 Term High Yield & Income ETF (IBHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SJNK | IBHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.74 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.21 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SJNK | IBHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.02 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | — | — |
Drawdowns
SJNK vs. IBHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SJNK drawdown since its inception was -19.74%, which is greater than IBHD's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SJNK and IBHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SJNK | IBHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.74% | 0.00% | -19.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.77% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.18% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.74% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.19% | 0.00% | -0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.63% | 0.00% | -1.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.40% | — | — |
Volatility
SJNK vs. IBHD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SJNK | IBHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.91% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.45% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.20% | 0.00% | +3.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.83% | 0.00% | +5.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.49% | 0.00% | +6.49% |
SJNK vs. IBHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
SJNK has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than IBHD's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
SJNK vs. IBHD - Dividend Comparison
SJNK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.02%, while IBHD has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBHD iShares iBonds 2024 Term High Yield & Income ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SJNK SPDR Bloomberg Barclays Short Term High Yield Bond ETF | 7.02% | 7.12% | 7.47% | 7.20% | 5.85% | 4.21% | 5.34% | 5.64% | 5.69% | 5.64% | 5.65% | 5.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, IBHD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IBHD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for SJNK.
SJNK has the higher dividend yield at 7.02%, compared with 0.00% for IBHD.
SJNK tracks Bloomberg US High Yield 350mn Cash Pay 2% Capped (0-5 Y), while IBHD tracks Bloomberg 2024 Term High Yield and Income Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for SJNK and 0.35% for IBHD.
Find the right allocation for SJNK and IBHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer