SJCP vs. ZHOG
SJCP (SanJac Alpha Core Plus Bond ETF) and ZHOG (F/m Opportunistic Income ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SJCP returned 4.21% vs 4.74% for ZHOG. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SJCP charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for ZHOG.
Performance
SJCP vs. ZHOG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SJCP achieves a 0.72% return, which is significantly lower than ZHOG's 0.81% return.
SJCP
- 1D
- -0.22%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 0.72%
- 6M
- 0.82%
- 1Y
- 4.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ZHOG
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- 0.37%
- YTD
- 0.81%
- 6M
- 1.02%
- 1Y
- 4.74%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SJCP vs. ZHOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SJCP SanJac Alpha Core Plus Bond ETF | 0.72% | 6.27% | -0.16% |
ZHOG F/m Opportunistic Income ETF | 0.81% | 5.98% | -1.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between SJCP and ZHOG is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2024 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SJCP vs. ZHOG — Risk / Return Rank
SJCP
ZHOG
SJCP vs. ZHOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SanJac Alpha Core Plus Bond ETF (SJCP) and F/m Opportunistic Income ETF (ZHOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SJCP | ZHOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.60 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.10 | 3.64 | -1.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.50 | 15.65 | -7.15 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SJCP vs. ZHOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SJCP drawdown since its inception was -2.01%, smaller than the maximum ZHOG drawdown of -3.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SJCP and ZHOG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SJCP | ZHOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.01% | -3.66% | +1.65% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.01% | -1.31% | -0.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.60% | -0.22% | -0.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.27% | -0.69% | +0.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.50% | 0.30% | +0.20% |
Volatility
SJCP vs. ZHOG - Volatility Comparison
SanJac Alpha Core Plus Bond ETF (SJCP) has a higher volatility of 0.96% compared to F/m Opportunistic Income ETF (ZHOG) at 0.47%. This indicates that SJCP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZHOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SJCP | ZHOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.96% | 0.47% | +0.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.88% | 1.19% | +0.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.52% | 1.58% | +0.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.43% | 3.98% | -1.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.43% | 3.98% | -1.55% |
SJCP vs. ZHOG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SJCP has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than ZHOG's 0.43% expense ratio.
Dividends
SJCP vs. ZHOG - Dividend Comparison
SJCP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.81%, less than ZHOG's 5.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SJCP SanJac Alpha Core Plus Bond ETF | 3.81% | 4.05% | 1.40% | 0.00% |
ZHOG F/m Opportunistic Income ETF | 5.11% | 5.35% | 5.50% | 1.70% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SJCP and ZHOG have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SJCP has higher volatility (0.96%) compared to ZHOG (0.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SJCP dropped -2.01% vs ZHOG's -3.66%.
On 1-year performance, ZHOG leads with 4.74% vs 4.21% for SJCP. On fees, ZHOG is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, ZHOG has been the lower-risk option at 0.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ZHOG has performed better with a 4.74% return vs 4.21%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ZHOG is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SJCP.
ZHOG has the higher dividend yield at 5.11%, compared with 3.81% for SJCP.
They also come from different issuers: SanJac Alpha and F/m Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for SJCP and 0.43% for ZHOG.
ZHOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.01 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SJCP and ZHOG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer