SIXY.TO vs. HISA.NEO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Evolve Big Six Canadian Banks UltraYield Index ETF (SIXY.TO) and Evolve High Interest Savings Account ETF (HISA.NEO).

SIXY.TO and HISA.NEO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SIXY.TO is a passively managed fund by Evolve that tracks the performance of the Solactive Equal Weight Canada Banks Index. It was launched on Dec 1, 2025. HISA.NEO is an actively managed fund by Evolve. It was launched on Nov 19, 2019.

Performance

SIXY.TO vs. HISA.NEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Evolve Big Six Canadian Banks UltraYield Index ETF (SIXY.TO) and Evolve High Interest Savings Account ETF (HISA.NEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SIXY.TO vs. HISA.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
SIXY.TO Evolve Big Six Canadian Banks UltraYield Index ETF	0.37%	5.33%
HISA.NEO Evolve High Interest Savings Account ETF	0.30%	0.20%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIXY.TO achieves a 0.37% return, which is significantly higher than HISA.NEO's 0.30% return.

SIXY.TO

• 1D: 2.33%
• 1M: -5.44%
• YTD: 0.37%
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HISA.NEO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.30%
• 6M: 0.87%
• 1Y: 2.17%
• 3Y*: 3.30%
• 5Y*: 2.73%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIXY.TO vs. HISA.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIXY.TO has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than HISA.NEO's 0.15% expense ratio.

SIXY.TO

Evolve Big Six Canadian Banks UltraYield Index ETF

HISA.NEO

Evolve High Interest Savings Account ETF

Return for Risk

SIXY.TO vs. HISA.NEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HISA.NEO

HISA.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 99
HISA.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
HISA.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
HISA.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 100
HISA.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
HISA.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIXY.TO vs. HISA.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Evolve Big Six Canadian Banks UltraYield Index ETF (SIXY.TO) and Evolve High Interest Savings Account ETF (HISA.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SIXY.TO	HISA.NEO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	6.81	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	6.08	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.07	5.21	-4.14

Correlation

The correlation between SIXY.TO and HISA.NEO is 0.07, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

SIXY.TO vs. HISA.NEO - Dividend Comparison

SIXY.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.76%, more than HISA.NEO's 2.35% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
SIXY.TO Evolve Big Six Canadian Banks UltraYield Index ETF	5.76%	1.59%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HISA.NEO Evolve High Interest Savings Account ETF	2.35%	2.32%	3.65%	4.60%	2.22%	0.52%	0.84%	0.76%

Drawdowns

SIXY.TO vs. HISA.NEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIXY.TO drawdown since its inception was -9.64%, which is greater than HISA.NEO's maximum drawdown of -0.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXY.TO and HISA.NEO.

Drawdown Indicators

	SIXY.TO	HISA.NEO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.64%	-0.42%	-9.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.18%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-0.42%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.31%	0.00%	-7.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.19%	-0.01%	-2.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.02%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SIXY.TO	HISA.NEO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.08%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.31%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.71%	0.35%	+17.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.71%	0.46%	+17.25%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.71%	0.48%	+17.23%