PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SIXS vs. WCEO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SIXS vs. WCEO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF (SIXS) and Hypatia Women CEO ETF (WCEO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SIXS having a 18.92% return and WCEO slightly lower at 18.40%.


SIXS

1D
0.68%
1M
1.28%
6M
13.38%
YTD
18.92%
1Y
30.38%
3Y*
11.93%
5Y*
6.51%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.87%

WCEO

1D
1.74%
1M
1.31%
6M
13.20%
YTD
18.40%
1Y
30.78%
3Y*
14.25%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$739.57K$467.06K$234.23K
$58.82K$49.20K$48.58K

SIXS vs. WCEO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
SIXS
6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF
18.92%4.59%5.85%11.82%
WCEO
Hypatia Women CEO ETF
18.40%9.77%8.28%10.51%

Correlation

The correlation between SIXS and WCEO is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 9, 2023

0.84

The correlation between SIXS and WCEO shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SIXS vs. WCEO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
SIXS
WCEO

Financial Services

24.4%
18.4%

Healthcare

17.0%
12.0%

Utilities

11.5%
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

9.8%
4.1%

Real Estate

8.4%
6.5%

Industrials

7.5%
15.1%

Consumer Cyclical

6.6%
13.4%

Technology

6.3%
16.2%

Communication Services

5.3%
3.3%

Energy

2.1%
4.5%

Basic Materials

1.1%
4.2%

Financial Services

SIXS
24.4%
WCEO
18.4%

Healthcare

SIXS
17.0%
WCEO
12.0%

Utilities

SIXS
11.5%
WCEO
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

SIXS
9.8%
WCEO
4.1%

Real Estate

SIXS
8.4%
WCEO
6.5%

Industrials

SIXS
7.5%
WCEO
15.1%

Consumer Cyclical

SIXS
6.6%
WCEO
13.4%

Technology

SIXS
6.3%
WCEO
16.2%

Communication Services

SIXS
5.3%
WCEO
3.3%

Energy

SIXS
2.1%
WCEO
4.5%

Basic Materials

SIXS
1.1%
WCEO
4.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SIXS vs. WCEO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SIXS
SIXS Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
SIXS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIXS Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIXS Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
SIXS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIXS Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

WCEO
WCEO Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
WCEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WCEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
WCEO Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
WCEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
WCEO Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SIXS vs. WCEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF (SIXS) and Hypatia Women CEO ETF (WCEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SIXSWCEODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.37

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.26

4.45

-0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.15

14.32

-1.17

SIXS vs. WCEO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIXS Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is comparable to the WCEO Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIXS and WCEO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SIXS vs. WCEO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIXS drawdown since its inception was -27.68%, which is greater than WCEO's maximum drawdown of -25.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXS and WCEO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SIXSWCEODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.68%

-25.88%

-1.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.16%

-6.96%

-0.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.95%

-25.88%

+5.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.96%

0.00%

-0.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.73%

-5.28%

-3.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

2.16%

+0.16%

Volatility

SIXS vs. WCEO - Volatility Comparison

6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF (SIXS) and Hypatia Women CEO ETF (WCEO) have volatilities of 3.65% and 3.68%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SIXSWCEODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.65%

3.68%

-0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.34%

10.28%

-0.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.50%

14.81%

-1.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.50%

17.91%

-0.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.53%

17.91%

+1.62%

SIXS vs. WCEO - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIXS has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than WCEO's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

SIXS vs. WCEO - Dividend Comparison

SIXS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, more than WCEO's 0.54% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
SIXS
6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF
1.79%1.62%1.09%1.60%1.37%0.94%0.45%
WCEO
Hypatia Women CEO ETF
0.54%0.64%0.88%0.93%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SIXS and WCEO have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WCEO has higher volatility (3.68%) compared to SIXS (3.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIXS dropped -27.68% vs WCEO's -25.88%.

On 3-year performance, WCEO leads with 14.25% vs 11.93% for SIXS. On fees, WCEO is cheaper at 0.85% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, WCEO has performed better with a 14.25% return vs 11.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

WCEO is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for SIXS.

SIXS has the higher dividend yield at 1.79%, compared with 0.54% for WCEO.

They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and Hypatia. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for SIXS and 0.85% for WCEO.

SIXS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SIXS and WCEO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer