SIXS vs. SCDS

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

SIXS (6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF) and SCDS (JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, SIXS returned 27.95% vs 39.67% for SCDS. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SIXS charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for SCDS.

Performance

SIXS vs. SCDS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in 6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF (SIXS) and JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF (SCDS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIXS achieves a 19.15% return, which is significantly lower than SCDS's 26.85% return.

SIXS

• 1D: 1.71%
• 1M: 7.38%
• 6M: 14.40%
• YTD: 19.15%
• 1Y: 27.95%
• 3Y*: 13.65%
• 5Y*: 7.01%
• 10Y*: —

SCDS

• 1D: 0.12%
• 1M: 1.65%
• 6M: 18.43%
• YTD: 26.85%
• 1Y: 39.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIXS vs. SCDS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SIXS 6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF	19.15%	4.59%	7.13%
SCDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF	26.85%	11.27%	7.26%

Correlation

The correlation between SIXS and SCDS is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 8, 2024	0.73

The correlation between SIXS and SCDS shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.73 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

SIXS vs. SCDS - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SIXS	SCDS
Financial Services	24.2%	15.2%
Healthcare	16.9%	13.8%
Consumer Defensive	11.0%	2.5%
Utilities	10.5%	2.3%
Industrials	8.7%	16.3%
Real Estate	8.4%	5.4%
Technology	6.3%	23.8%
Consumer Cyclical	5.4%	10.3%
Communication Services	5.3%	2.4%
Energy	2.1%	4.8%
Basic Materials	1.1%	3.2%

Return for Risk

SIXS vs. SCDS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIXS

SIXS Risk / Return Rank: 81
SIXS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
SIXS Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
SIXS Omega Ratio Rank: 76
SIXS Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
SIXS Martin Ratio Rank: 79

SCDS

SCDS Risk / Return Rank: 86
SCDS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
SCDS Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
SCDS Omega Ratio Rank: 79
SCDS Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
SCDS Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIXS vs. SCDS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF (SIXS) and JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF (SCDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SIXS	SCDS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.05	2.18	-0.13
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.06	3.11	-0.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.37	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.92	4.50	-0.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.77	15.62	-3.85

SIXS vs. SCDS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIXS Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is comparable to the SCDS Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIXS and SCDS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

SIXS vs. SCDS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIXS drawdown since its inception was -27.68%, roughly equal to the maximum SCDS drawdown of -26.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXS and SCDS.

Drawdown Indicators

	SIXS	SCDS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.68%	-26.71%	-0.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.16%	-8.85%	+1.69%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.95%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.68%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.09%	+1.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.78%	-5.02%	-3.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.38%	2.55%	-0.17%

Volatility

SIXS vs. SCDS - Volatility Comparison

6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF (SIXS) and JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF (SCDS) have volatilities of 4.02% and 3.86%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SIXS	SCDS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.02%	3.86%	+0.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.48%	13.58%	-4.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.70%	18.33%	-4.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.55%	20.98%	-3.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.57%	20.98%	-1.41%

SIXS vs. SCDS - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIXS has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than SCDS's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

SIXS vs. SCDS - Dividend Comparison

SIXS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, more than SCDS's 0.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
SCDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Small Core ETF	0.91%	1.15%	0.42%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SIXS 6 Meridian Small Cap Equity ETF	1.67%	1.62%	1.09%	1.60%	1.37%	0.94%	0.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SIXS and SCDS in my portfolio?

SIXS and SCDS have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SIXS or SCDS?

SIXS has higher volatility (4.02%) compared to SCDS (3.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIXS dropped -27.68% vs SCDS's -26.71%.

Which ETF is better, SIXS or SCDS?

On 1-year performance, SCDS leads with 39.67% vs 27.95% for SIXS. On fees, SCDS is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, SCDS has been the lower-risk option at 3.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SIXS or SCDS?

Over the 1-year period, SCDS has performed better with a 39.67% return vs 27.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SIXS or SCDS?

SCDS is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for SIXS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SIXS or SCDS?

SIXS has the higher dividend yield at 1.67%, compared with 0.91% for SCDS.

What is the main difference between SIXS and SCDS?

They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for SIXS and 0.40% for SCDS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCDS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 2.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.