SIXA vs. DMAY
SIXA (6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF) and DMAY (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. SIXA is actively managed, while DMAY is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SIXA returned 12.50%/yr vs 7.16%/yr for DMAY. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SIXA charges 0.86%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for DMAY.
Performance
SIXA vs. DMAY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIXA achieves a 11.89% return, which is significantly higher than DMAY's 4.42% return.
SIXA
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 2.40%
- YTD
- 11.89%
- 6M
- 12.48%
- 1Y
- 18.71%
- 3Y*
- 20.65%
- 5Y*
- 12.50%
- 10Y*
- —
DMAY
- 1D
- -0.30%
- 1M
- 1.30%
- YTD
- 4.42%
- 6M
- 5.19%
- 1Y
- 12.37%
- 3Y*
- 11.96%
- 5Y*
- 7.16%
- 10Y*
- —
SIXA vs. DMAY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIXA 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF | 11.89% | 15.52% | 22.70% | 11.98% | -5.72% | 23.87% | 18.43% |
DMAY FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May | 4.42% | 11.05% | 12.82% | 15.40% | -9.98% | 6.14% | 6.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between SIXA and DMAY is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2020 | 0.73 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SIXA and DMAY has dropped to 0.53 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
SIXA vs. DMAY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SIXA
DMAY
Consumer Defensive
Technology
Communication Services
Healthcare
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Energy
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
SIXA
DMAY
Technology
SIXA
DMAY
Communication Services
SIXA
DMAY
Healthcare
SIXA
DMAY
Financial Services
SIXA
DMAY
Industrials
SIXA
DMAY
Consumer Cyclical
SIXA
DMAY
Utilities
SIXA
DMAY
Energy
SIXA
DMAY
Real Estate
SIXA
DMAY
Basic Materials
SIXA
-
DMAY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SIXA vs. DMAY — Risk / Return Rank
SIXA
DMAY
SIXA vs. DMAY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF (SIXA) and FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SIXA | DMAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.60 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.36 | 3.73 | -0.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.75 | 22.76 | -10.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SIXA | DMAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.10 | 2.65 | -0.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 | 0.80 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.20 | 0.88 | +0.32 |
Drawdowns
SIXA vs. DMAY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIXA drawdown since its inception was -18.38%, which is greater than DMAY's maximum drawdown of -13.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIXA and DMAY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIXA | DMAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.38% | -13.90% | -4.48% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.59% | -3.36% | -2.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.22% | -12.38% | +1.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.38% | -13.90% | -4.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.84% | -0.30% | -0.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.00% | -2.24% | -0.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.47% | 0.55% | +0.92% |
Volatility
SIXA vs. DMAY - Volatility Comparison
6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF (SIXA) has a higher volatility of 2.56% compared to FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May (DMAY) at 0.84%. This indicates that SIXA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DMAY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SIXA | DMAY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.56% | 0.84% | +1.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.76% | 3.74% | +3.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.94% | 4.73% | +4.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.80% | 9.02% | +3.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.36% | 8.43% | +4.93% |
SIXA vs. DMAY - Expense Ratio Comparison
SIXA has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than DMAY's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
SIXA vs. DMAY - Dividend Comparison
SIXA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.01%, while DMAY has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DMAY FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Deep Buffer ETF - May | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SIXA 6 Meridian Mega Cap Equity ETF | 2.01% | 2.31% | 1.62% | 2.12% | 2.23% | 1.63% | 1.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SIXA and DMAY have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SIXA has higher volatility (2.56%) compared to DMAY (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIXA dropped -18.38% vs DMAY's -13.90%.
On 5-year performance, SIXA leads with 12.50% vs 7.16% for DMAY. On fees, DMAY is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, DMAY has been the lower-risk option at 0.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SIXA has performed better with a 12.50% return vs 7.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DMAY is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for SIXA.
SIXA has the higher dividend yield at 2.01%, compared with 0.00% for DMAY.
They also come from different issuers: Exchange Traded Concepts and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.86% for SIXA and 0.85% for DMAY.
DMAY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SIXA and DMAY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer