PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SIUSX vs. SECEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SIUSX vs. SECEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Guggenheim Core Bond Fund (SIUSX) and Guggenheim StylePlus - Large Core Fund (SECEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIUSX achieves a 0.53% return, which is significantly lower than SECEX's 14.79% return. Over the past 10 years, SIUSX has underperformed SECEX with an annualized return of 2.37%, while SECEX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.76% annualized return.


SIUSX

1D
0.06%
1M
0.54%
YTD
0.53%
6M
0.42%
1Y
5.73%
3Y*
4.65%
5Y*
-0.04%
10Y*
2.37%

SECEX

1D
0.53%
1M
9.52%
YTD
14.79%
6M
14.69%
1Y
32.04%
3Y*
23.65%
5Y*
13.51%
10Y*
14.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIUSX vs. SECEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SIUSX
Guggenheim Core Bond Fund
0.53%7.54%2.54%6.75%-16.77%-1.20%14.30%4.11%0.84%6.33%
SECEX
Guggenheim StylePlus - Large Core Fund
14.79%16.04%25.74%26.72%-21.98%28.21%17.76%29.62%-7.18%21.99%

Correlation

The correlation between SIUSX and SECEX is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1990

-0.03

The correlation between SIUSX and SECEX shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (all time) to 0.25 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SIUSX vs. SECEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIUSX
SIUSX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
SIUSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIUSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIUSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
SIUSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIUSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

SECEX
SECEX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
SECEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SECEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
SECEX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
SECEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
SECEX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIUSX vs. SECEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guggenheim Core Bond Fund (SIUSX) and Guggenheim StylePlus - Large Core Fund (SECEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SIUSXSECEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.47

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.91

3.21

-1.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.77

14.56

-8.80

SIUSX vs. SECEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIUSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is lower than the SECEX Sharpe Ratio of 2.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIUSX and SECEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SIUSXSECEXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.42

2.68

-1.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

0.80

-0.81

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.82

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.32

+0.01

Drawdowns

SIUSX vs. SECEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIUSX drawdown since its inception was -22.25%, smaller than the maximum SECEX drawdown of -73.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIUSX and SECEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SIUSXSECEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.25%

-73.88%

+51.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.99%

-10.23%

+7.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.17%

-18.34%

+12.17%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.25%

-27.55%

+5.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.25%

-35.59%

+13.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.95%

0.00%

-2.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.93%

-20.68%

+14.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.99%

2.25%

-1.26%

Volatility

SIUSX vs. SECEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Guggenheim Core Bond Fund (SIUSX) is 1.42%, while Guggenheim StylePlus - Large Core Fund (SECEX) has a volatility of 3.85%. This indicates that SIUSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SECEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SIUSXSECEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.42%

3.85%

-2.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.90%

9.52%

-6.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.03%

12.24%

-8.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.90%

17.02%

-11.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.81%

18.12%

-13.31%

SIUSX vs. SECEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIUSX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than SECEX's 1.31% expense ratio.


Dividends

SIUSX vs. SECEX - Dividend Comparison

SIUSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.49%, more than SECEX's 2.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SECEX
Guggenheim StylePlus - Large Core Fund
2.57%2.95%23.10%2.50%40.57%4.58%9.21%1.57%22.52%18.80%1.94%12.32%
SIUSX
Guggenheim Core Bond Fund
4.49%4.46%4.39%4.10%2.50%3.11%4.10%2.03%2.46%3.16%3.57%4.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


SIUSX and SECEX have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SECEX has higher volatility (3.85%) compared to SIUSX (1.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIUSX dropped -22.25% vs SECEX's -73.88%.

SECEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SIUSX and SECEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer