PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SIS.TO vs. GRT-UN.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SIS.TO vs. GRT-UN.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Savaria Corporation (SIS.TO) and Granite Real Estate Investment Trust (GRT-UN.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIS.TO achieves a 33.17% return, which is significantly higher than GRT-UN.TO's 19.72% return. Over the past 10 years, SIS.TO has outperformed GRT-UN.TO with an annualized return of 17.59%, while GRT-UN.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 14.48% annualized return.


SIS.TO

1D
0.87%
1M
6.35%
YTD
33.17%
6M
40.53%
1Y
61.12%
3Y*
25.21%
5Y*
11.69%
10Y*
17.59%

GRT-UN.TO

1D
0.22%
1M
3.25%
YTD
19.72%
6M
28.31%
1Y
41.14%
3Y*
9.94%
5Y*
7.55%
10Y*
14.48%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIS.TO vs. GRT-UN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SIS.TO
Savaria Corporation
33.17%17.77%34.86%12.15%-24.44%35.92%7.37%10.42%-26.61%71.44%
GRT-UN.TO
Granite Real Estate Investment Trust
19.72%22.80%-4.30%15.18%-31.88%40.16%22.56%29.65%14.45%15.87%

Correlation

The correlation between SIS.TO and GRT-UN.TO is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 7, 2006

0.12

The correlation between SIS.TO and GRT-UN.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (all time) to 0.28 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SIS.TO:

CA$2.19B

GRT-UN.TO:

CA$5.83B

EPS

SIS.TO:

CA$1.10

GRT-UN.TO:

CA$6.39

PE Ratio

SIS.TO:

27.43

GRT-UN.TO:

15.07

PEG Ratio

SIS.TO:

0.43

GRT-UN.TO:

0.93

PS Ratio

SIS.TO:

2.33

GRT-UN.TO:

9.32

PB Ratio

SIS.TO:

3.32

GRT-UN.TO:

1.04

Total Revenue (TTM)

SIS.TO:

CA$928.84M

GRT-UN.TO:

CA$629.87M

Gross Profit (TTM)

SIS.TO:

CA$362.29M

GRT-UN.TO:

CA$517.51M

EBITDA (TTM)

SIS.TO:

CA$176.47M

GRT-UN.TO:

CA$513.85M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SIS.TO vs. GRT-UN.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIS.TO
SIS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
SIS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
SIS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

GRT-UN.TO
GRT-UN.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
GRT-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRT-UN.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRT-UN.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
GRT-UN.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRT-UN.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIS.TO vs. GRT-UN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Savaria Corporation (SIS.TO) and Granite Real Estate Investment Trust (GRT-UN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SIS.TOGRT-UN.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.37

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.32

3.20

+3.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.52

10.28

+8.24

SIS.TO vs. GRT-UN.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIS.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.60, which is comparable to the GRT-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIS.TO and GRT-UN.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SIS.TOGRT-UN.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.60

2.15

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

0.35

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.65

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.33

+0.06

Drawdowns

SIS.TO vs. GRT-UN.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIS.TO drawdown since its inception was -75.48%, smaller than the maximum GRT-UN.TO drawdown of -87.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIS.TO and GRT-UN.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SIS.TOGRT-UN.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.48%

-87.48%

+12.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.72%

-12.91%

+3.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-33.99%

-27.99%

-6.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-44.22%

-37.82%

-6.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.16%

-44.89%

-17.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.47%

-0.77%

+0.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.77%

-16.98%

-3.79%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.31%

4.01%

-0.70%

Volatility

SIS.TO vs. GRT-UN.TO - Volatility Comparison

Savaria Corporation (SIS.TO) has a higher volatility of 6.66% compared to Granite Real Estate Investment Trust (GRT-UN.TO) at 5.88%. This indicates that SIS.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GRT-UN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SIS.TOGRT-UN.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.66%

5.88%

+0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.37%

14.87%

+4.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.64%

19.25%

+4.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.92%

21.88%

+5.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

32.32%

22.44%

+9.88%

Dividends

SIS.TO vs. GRT-UN.TO - Dividend Comparison

SIS.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, less than GRT-UN.TO's 3.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GRT-UN.TO
Granite Real Estate Investment Trust
3.61%4.18%4.74%4.21%4.50%2.86%3.43%4.25%5.69%5.31%5.42%1.62%
SIS.TO
Savaria Corporation
1.85%2.40%2.65%3.42%3.62%2.54%3.23%3.11%2.91%1.73%1.98%3.09%

Financials

SIS.TO vs. GRT-UN.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Savaria Corporation and Granite Real Estate Investment Trust. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M20222023202420252026
235.55M
165.83M
(SIS.TO) Total Revenue
(GRT-UN.TO) Total Revenue
Values in CAD except per share items

SIS.TO vs. GRT-UN.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Savaria Corporation and Granite Real Estate Investment Trust over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%20222023202420252026
39.0%
81.0%
Portfolio components
SIS.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Savaria Corporation reported a gross profit of 91.74M and revenue of 235.55M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.0%.

GRT-UN.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Granite Real Estate Investment Trust reported a gross profit of 134.27M and revenue of 165.83M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 81.0%.

SIS.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Savaria Corporation reported an operating income of 33.15M and revenue of 235.55M, resulting in an operating margin of 14.1%.

GRT-UN.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Granite Real Estate Investment Trust reported an operating income of 122.29M and revenue of 165.83M, resulting in an operating margin of 73.7%.

SIS.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Savaria Corporation reported a net income of 22.68M and revenue of 235.55M, resulting in a net margin of 9.6%.

GRT-UN.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Granite Real Estate Investment Trust reported a net income of 91.25M and revenue of 165.83M, resulting in a net margin of 55.0%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SIS.TO and GRT-UN.TO have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SIS.TO and GRT-UN.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer