PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SIRIX vs. HFSAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SIRIX vs. HFSAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ocean Park Tactical All Asset Fund (SIRIX) and Hundredfold Select Alternative Fund Investor Class (HFSAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIRIX achieves a 3.27% return, which is significantly higher than HFSAX's 0.62% return. Over the past 10 years, SIRIX has underperformed HFSAX with an annualized return of 2.41%, while HFSAX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.17% annualized return.


SIRIX

1D
0.74%
1M
-1.15%
6M
1.52%
YTD
3.27%
1Y
8.88%
3Y*
5.07%
5Y*
1.53%
10Y*
2.41%
ALL TIME*
3.78%

HFSAX

1D
0.37%
1M
-0.21%
6M
-0.45%
YTD
0.62%
1Y
7.69%
3Y*
7.99%
5Y*
3.52%
10Y*
8.17%
ALL TIME*
7.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

SIRIX vs. HFSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SIRIX
Ocean Park Tactical All Asset Fund
3.27%4.74%4.90%4.17%-6.82%0.48%4.81%7.71%-4.24%7.45%
HFSAX
Hundredfold Select Alternative Fund Investor Class
0.62%11.97%3.75%10.93%-9.44%9.05%38.71%10.35%-1.97%9.91%

Correlation

The correlation between SIRIX and HFSAX is 0.83, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.73

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013

0.61

Over the past year, SIRIX and HFSAX have become more correlated (0.83) than their long-term average of 0.61, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SIRIX vs. HFSAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SIRIX
SIRIX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
SIRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
SIRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

HFSAX
HFSAX Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
HFSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
HFSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SIRIX vs. HFSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ocean Park Tactical All Asset Fund (SIRIX) and Hundredfold Select Alternative Fund Investor Class (HFSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SIRIXHFSAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.30

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.57

2.03

-0.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.44

5.01

+0.44

SIRIX vs. HFSAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIRIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is comparable to the HFSAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIRIX and HFSAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SIRIX vs. HFSAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIRIX drawdown since its inception was -11.31%, smaller than the maximum HFSAX drawdown of -12.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIRIX and HFSAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SIRIXHFSAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.31%

-12.81%

+1.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.42%

-3.68%

-1.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.99%

-5.67%

-2.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.30%

-12.13%

+0.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-11.31%

-12.81%

+1.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.24%

-2.18%

-0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.42%

-2.38%

-0.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.55%

1.48%

+0.07%

Volatility

SIRIX vs. HFSAX - Volatility Comparison

Ocean Park Tactical All Asset Fund (SIRIX) has a higher volatility of 2.30% compared to Hundredfold Select Alternative Fund Investor Class (HFSAX) at 0.98%. This indicates that SIRIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HFSAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SIRIXHFSAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.30%

0.98%

+1.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.20%

3.59%

+2.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.17%

4.75%

+2.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.46%

6.20%

-0.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.29%

6.23%

-1.94%

SIRIX vs. HFSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIRIX has a 1.70% expense ratio, which is lower than HFSAX's 1.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

SIRIX vs. HFSAX - Dividend Comparison

SIRIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.17%, less than HFSAX's 9.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HFSAX
Hundredfold Select Alternative Fund Investor Class
9.69%9.75%5.87%5.17%4.92%10.98%13.58%6.44%3.11%11.06%5.60%1.85%
SIRIX
Ocean Park Tactical All Asset Fund
2.17%2.65%2.88%2.71%1.59%2.52%1.37%2.51%2.23%2.41%2.15%2.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


SIRIX and HFSAX have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SIRIX has higher volatility (2.30%) compared to HFSAX (0.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIRIX dropped -11.31% vs HFSAX's -12.81%.

HFSAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SIRIX and HFSAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer