SIOO vs. IXC
SIOO (VistaShares Target 15 S&P 100 Distribution ETF) and IXC (iShares Global Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SIOO is a Derivative Income fund tracking the S&P 100, while IXC is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global 1200 Energy Capped Index. Both are passively managed. At a correlation of -0.24, they often move in opposite directions. SIOO charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for IXC.
Performance
SIOO vs. IXC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIOO achieves a 7.33% return, which is significantly lower than IXC's 23.35% return.
SIOO
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 2.51%
- 6M
- 6.82%
- YTD
- 7.33%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IXC
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- -4.50%
- 6M
- 20.68%
- YTD
- 23.35%
- 1Y
- 29.02%
- 3Y*
- 14.69%
- 5Y*
- 18.91%
- 10Y*
- 8.83%
SIOO vs. IXC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SIOO VistaShares Target 15 S&P 100 Distribution ETF | 7.33% | 1.16% |
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 23.35% | -1.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between SIOO and IXC is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025 | -0.24 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SIOO vs. IXC — Risk / Return Rank
SIOO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IXC
SIOO vs. IXC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VistaShares Target 15 S&P 100 Distribution ETF (SIOO) and iShares Global Energy ETF (IXC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SIOO | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.26 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.95 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 6.26 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SIOO vs. IXC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIOO drawdown since its inception was -6.86%, smaller than the maximum IXC drawdown of -67.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIOO and IXC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIOO | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.86% | -67.88% | +61.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.36% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -64.16% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -11.22% | +11.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.06% | -17.45% | +16.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.78% | — |
Volatility
SIOO vs. IXC - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SIOO | IXC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.59% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 15.86% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.52% | 19.18% | -8.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.52% | 23.45% | -12.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.52% | 26.81% | -16.29% |
SIOO vs. IXC - Expense Ratio Comparison
SIOO has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than IXC's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
SIOO vs. IXC - Dividend Comparison
SIOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.69%, more than IXC's 3.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IXC iShares Global Energy ETF | 3.08% | 3.68% | 4.56% | 3.45% | 4.76% | 3.98% | 4.86% | 7.00% | 3.51% | 3.05% | 2.86% | 3.77% |
SIOO VistaShares Target 15 S&P 100 Distribution ETF | 8.69% | 1.27% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SIOO and IXC have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IXC is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IXC is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for SIOO.
SIOO has the higher dividend yield at 8.69%, compared with 3.08% for IXC.
SIOO is categorized as Derivative Income, while IXC is Energy Equities. SIOO tracks S&P 100, while IXC tracks S&P Global 1200 Energy Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: VistaShares and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for SIOO and 0.40% for IXC.
Find the right allocation for SIOO and IXC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer