PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SIOO vs. FENY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SIOO vs. FENY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VistaShares Target 15 S&P 100 Distribution ETF (SIOO) and Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF (FENY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIOO achieves a 7.30% return, which is significantly lower than FENY's 29.32% return.


SIOO

1D
0.03%
1M
1.47%
6M
7.15%
YTD
7.30%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FENY

1D
0.80%
1M
3.75%
6M
21.33%
YTD
29.32%
1Y
36.92%
3Y*
15.86%
5Y*
22.94%
10Y*
8.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIOO vs. FENY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SIOO and FENY is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2025

-0.26

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SIOO vs. FENY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIOO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


FENY
FENY Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
FENY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FENY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
FENY Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FENY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
FENY Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIOO vs. FENY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VistaShares Target 15 S&P 100 Distribution ETF (SIOO) and Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF (FENY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SIOOFENYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.74

SIOO vs. FENY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SIOO vs. FENY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIOO drawdown since its inception was -6.86%, smaller than the maximum FENY drawdown of -74.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIOO and FENY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SIOOFENYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.86%

-74.35%

+67.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-69.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.14%

-8.45%

+8.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.04%

-23.01%

+21.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.50%

Volatility

SIOO vs. FENY - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SIOOFENYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.40%

20.83%

-10.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.40%

26.31%

-15.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.40%

29.78%

-19.38%

SIOO vs. FENY - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIOO has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than FENY's 0.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

SIOO vs. FENY - Dividend Comparison

SIOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.69%, more than FENY's 2.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FENY
Fidelity MSCI Energy Index ETF
2.46%3.18%3.05%3.33%3.33%3.69%4.60%6.43%3.21%2.94%2.29%3.05%
SIOO
VistaShares Target 15 S&P 100 Distribution ETF
8.69%1.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


SIOO and FENY have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FENY is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FENY is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for SIOO.

SIOO has the higher dividend yield at 8.69%, compared with 2.46% for FENY.

SIOO is categorized as Derivative Income, while FENY is Energy Equities. SIOO tracks S&P 100, while FENY tracks MSCI USA IMI Energy 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: VistaShares and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for SIOO and 0.08% for FENY.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SIOO and FENY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer