PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SIOO vs. ARMW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SIOO vs. ARMW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VistaShares Target 15 S&P 100 Distribution ETF (SIOO) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIOO achieves a 6.19% return, which is significantly lower than ARMW's 363.23% return.


SIOO

1D
-0.18%
1M
2.52%
YTD
6.19%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ARMW

1D
3.44%
1M
128.75%
YTD
363.23%
6M
245.13%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIOO vs. ARMW - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between SIOO and ARMW is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2025

0.46

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SIOO vs. ARMW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VistaShares Target 15 S&P 100 Distribution ETF (SIOO) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

SIOO vs. ARMW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SIOOARMWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.51

4.96

-3.45

Drawdowns

SIOO vs. ARMW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIOO drawdown since its inception was -6.86%, smaller than the maximum ARMW drawdown of -48.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIOO and ARMW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SIOOARMWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.86%

-48.47%

+41.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.57%

0.00%

-0.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.02%

-26.55%

+25.53%

Volatility

SIOO vs. ARMW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SIOOARMWDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.36%

88.46%

-78.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.36%

88.46%

-78.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.36%

88.46%

-78.10%

SIOO vs. ARMW - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIOO has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than ARMW's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

SIOO vs. ARMW - Dividend Comparison

SIOO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.44%, less than ARMW's 15.20% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


SIOO and ARMW have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SIOO is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SIOO is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for ARMW.

ARMW has the higher dividend yield at 15.20%, compared with 7.44% for SIOO.

They also come from different issuers: VistaShares and Roundhill Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for SIOO and 0.99% for ARMW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SIOO and ARMW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer