SIO vs. XAGG
SIO (Touchstone Strategic Income Opportunities ETF) and XAGG (Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SIO charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for XAGG.
Performance
SIO vs. XAGG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIO achieves a 0.79% return, which is significantly lower than XAGG's 1.93% return.
SIO
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 0.79%
- 6M
- 1.08%
- 1Y
- 6.63%
- 3Y*
- 7.30%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XAGG
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 1.93%
- 6M
- 2.07%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SIO vs. XAGG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SIO Touchstone Strategic Income Opportunities ETF | 0.79% | 0.91% |
XAGG Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF | 1.93% | 1.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between SIO and XAGG is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2025 | 0.65 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SIO vs. XAGG — Risk / Return Rank
SIO
XAGG
SIO vs. XAGG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Touchstone Strategic Income Opportunities ETF (SIO) and Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF (XAGG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SIO | XAGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.54 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.78 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SIO | XAGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.32 | 1.88 | -0.56 |
Drawdowns
SIO vs. XAGG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIO drawdown since its inception was -6.94%, which is greater than XAGG's maximum drawdown of -2.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIO and XAGG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIO | XAGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.94% | -2.88% | -4.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.62% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.34% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.13% | -0.49% | -0.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.25% | -0.57% | -0.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.85% | — | — |
Volatility
SIO vs. XAGG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SIO | XAGG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.15% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.97% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.38% | 3.48% | +0.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.00% | 3.48% | +1.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.00% | 3.48% | +1.52% |
SIO vs. XAGG - Expense Ratio Comparison
SIO has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than XAGG's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
SIO vs. XAGG - Dividend Comparison
SIO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.94%, more than XAGG's 3.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIO Touchstone Strategic Income Opportunities ETF | 6.94% | 6.80% | 5.30% | 5.37% | 3.12% |
XAGG Eaton Vance Income Opportunities ETF | 3.86% | 1.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SIO and XAGG have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XAGG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XAGG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SIO.
SIO has the higher dividend yield at 6.94%, compared with 3.86% for XAGG.
They also come from different issuers: Touchstone and Eaton Vance. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for SIO and 0.50% for XAGG.
Find the right allocation for SIO and XAGG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer