PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SILG.L vs. VVMX.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SILG.L vs. VVMX.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (SILG.L) and VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (VVMX.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SILG.L is traded in GBP, while VVMX.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the VVMX.DE values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SILG.L achieves a -9.34% return, which is significantly lower than VVMX.DE's 29.16% return.


SILG.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-24.12%
YTD
-9.34%
6M
-6.79%
1Y
62.90%
3Y*
39.52%
5Y*
10Y*

VVMX.DE

1D
-1.75%
1M
-4.12%
YTD
29.16%
6M
35.47%
1Y
149.03%
3Y*
3.48%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SILG.L vs. VVMX.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SILG.L
Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating
-9.34%153.98%13.53%-6.34%-8.01%
VVMX.DE
VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A
29.16%77.22%-33.82%-22.74%-17.46%

Correlation

The correlation between SILG.L and VVMX.DE is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2022

0.43

The correlation between SILG.L and VVMX.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (all time) to 0.55 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SILG.L vs. VVMX.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SILG.L
SILG.L Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
SILG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SILG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
SILG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
SILG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
SILG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

VVMX.DE
VVMX.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
VVMX.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VVMX.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
VVMX.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
VVMX.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
VVMX.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SILG.L vs. VVMX.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (SILG.L) and VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (VVMX.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SILG.LVVMX.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.46

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.76

7.75

-5.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.63

21.01

-16.38

SILG.L vs. VVMX.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SILG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the VVMX.DE Sharpe Ratio of 3.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SILG.L and VVMX.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SILG.L vs. VVMX.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SILG.L drawdown since its inception was -35.90%, smaller than the maximum VVMX.DE drawdown of -72.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SILG.L and VVMX.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SILG.LVVMX.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.90%

-72.71%

+36.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.90%

-20.85%

-15.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.90%

-61.46%

+25.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.25%

-22.96%

-12.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.61%

-39.79%

+27.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.61%

7.70%

+5.91%

Volatility

SILG.L vs. VVMX.DE - Volatility Comparison

Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (SILG.L) has a higher volatility of 15.15% compared to VanEck Rare Earth and Strategic Metals UCITS ETF A (VVMX.DE) at 12.38%. This indicates that SILG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VVMX.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SILG.LVVMX.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.15%

12.38%

+2.77%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.29%

31.67%

+9.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.46%

45.72%

+4.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.70%

35.98%

+3.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.70%

35.98%

+3.72%

SILG.L vs. VVMX.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SILG.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than VVMX.DE's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

SILG.L vs. VVMX.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither SILG.L nor VVMX.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


SILG.L and VVMX.DE have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VVMX.DE is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VVMX.DE is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SILG.L.

SILG.L is categorized as Silver, while VVMX.DE is Rare Earth & Strategic Metals. SILG.L tracks Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return v2 Index, while VVMX.DE tracks MVIS Global Rare Earth/Strategic Metals. They also come from different issuers: Global X and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for SILG.L and 0.59% for VVMX.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SILG.L and VVMX.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer