SILG.L vs. DAVV.DE
SILG.L (Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) and DAVV.DE (VanEck Crypto and Blockchain Innovators UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SILG.L is a Silver fund tracking the Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return v2 Index, while DAVV.DE is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Digital Assets Equity. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SILG.L returned 39.52%/yr vs 52.48%/yr for DAVV.DE. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.65% expense ratio.
Performance
SILG.L vs. DAVV.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SILG.L is traded in GBP, while DAVV.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the DAVV.DE values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SILG.L achieves a -9.34% return, which is significantly lower than DAVV.DE's 26.10% return.
SILG.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -24.12%
- YTD
- -9.34%
- 6M
- -6.79%
- 1Y
- 62.90%
- 3Y*
- 39.52%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DAVV.DE
- 1D
- -3.73%
- 1M
- -3.68%
- YTD
- 26.10%
- 6M
- 14.20%
- 1Y
- 49.93%
- 3Y*
- 52.48%
- 5Y*
- -1.17%
- 10Y*
- —
SILG.L vs. DAVV.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SILG.L Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | -9.34% | 153.98% | 13.53% | -6.34% | -8.01% |
DAVV.DE VanEck Crypto and Blockchain Innovators UCITS ETF | 26.10% | 4.49% | 31.44% | 328.35% | -73.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between SILG.L and DAVV.DE is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 6, 2022 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SILG.L vs. DAVV.DE — Risk / Return Rank
SILG.L
DAVV.DE
SILG.L vs. DAVV.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (SILG.L) and VanEck Crypto and Blockchain Innovators UCITS ETF (DAVV.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SILG.L | DAVV.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.37 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.17 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.76 | 1.12 | +0.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.63 | 2.06 | +2.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SILG.L vs. DAVV.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SILG.L drawdown since its inception was -35.90%, smaller than the maximum DAVV.DE drawdown of -91.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SILG.L and DAVV.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SILG.L | DAVV.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.90% | -91.25% | +55.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -35.90% | -45.43% | +9.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.90% | -58.82% | +22.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -91.25% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -35.25% | -33.82% | -1.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.61% | -57.84% | +45.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.61% | 24.74% | -11.13% |
Volatility
SILG.L vs. DAVV.DE - Volatility Comparison
Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (SILG.L) and VanEck Crypto and Blockchain Innovators UCITS ETF (DAVV.DE) have volatilities of 15.15% and 14.76%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SILG.L | DAVV.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.15% | 14.76% | +0.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 41.29% | 40.05% | +1.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.46% | 57.68% | -7.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.70% | 70.56% | -30.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.70% | 70.36% | -30.66% |
SILG.L vs. DAVV.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both SILG.L and DAVV.DE have an expense ratio of 0.65%.
Dividends
SILG.L vs. DAVV.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither SILG.L nor DAVV.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SILG.L and DAVV.DE have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.65% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SILG.L and DAVV.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.65% per year.
SILG.L is categorized as Silver, while DAVV.DE is Technology Equities. SILG.L tracks Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return v2 Index, while DAVV.DE tracks MVIS Global Digital Assets Equity. They also come from different issuers: Global X and VanEck.
Find the right allocation for SILG.L and DAVV.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer