SILG.L vs. BKCG.L
SILG.L (Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) and BKCG.L (Global X Blockchain UCITS ETF USD Accumulating) are both exchange-traded funds - SILG.L is a Silver fund tracking the Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return v2 Index, while BKCG.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SILG.L returned 45.51%/yr vs 56.44%/yr for BKCG.L. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SILG.L charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for BKCG.L.
Performance
SILG.L vs. BKCG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SILG.L achieves a 5.62% return, which is significantly lower than BKCG.L's 35.75% return.
SILG.L
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 2.67%
- YTD
- 5.62%
- 6M
- 16.67%
- 1Y
- 98.68%
- 3Y*
- 45.51%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BKCG.L
- 1D
- -3.52%
- 1M
- 10.26%
- YTD
- 35.75%
- 6M
- 10.16%
- 1Y
- 105.28%
- 3Y*
- 56.44%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SILG.L vs. BKCG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SILG.L Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 5.62% | 153.98% | 13.53% | -6.34% | -8.01% |
BKCG.L Global X Blockchain UCITS ETF USD Accumulating | 35.75% | 23.16% | 6.98% | 308.24% | -70.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between SILG.L and BKCG.L is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 9, 2022 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SILG.L vs. BKCG.L — Risk / Return Rank
SILG.L
BKCG.L
SILG.L vs. BKCG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (SILG.L) and Global X Blockchain UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (BKCG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SILG.L | BKCG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.25 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.16 | 1.94 | +1.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.69 | 3.51 | +4.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SILG.L | BKCG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.98 | 1.56 | +0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.68 | 0.16 | +0.51 |
Drawdowns
SILG.L vs. BKCG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SILG.L drawdown since its inception was -32.00%, smaller than the maximum BKCG.L drawdown of -82.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SILG.L and BKCG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SILG.L | BKCG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.00% | -82.56% | +50.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -30.90% | -54.08% | +23.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.90% | -57.72% | +26.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.56% | -25.72% | +1.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.52% | -43.37% | +30.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.74% | 29.84% | -17.10% |
Volatility
SILG.L vs. BKCG.L - Volatility Comparison
Global X Silver Miners UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (SILG.L) and Global X Blockchain UCITS ETF USD Accumulating (BKCG.L) have volatilities of 18.48% and 19.30%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SILG.L | BKCG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.48% | 19.30% | -0.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.95% | 45.66% | -5.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 49.23% | 67.15% | -17.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.40% | 74.54% | -35.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.40% | 74.54% | -35.14% |
SILG.L vs. BKCG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SILG.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than BKCG.L's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
SILG.L vs. BKCG.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither SILG.L nor BKCG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SILG.L and BKCG.L have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BKCG.L is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BKCG.L is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SILG.L.
SILG.L is categorized as Silver, while BKCG.L is Technology Equities. SILG.L tracks Solactive Global Silver Miners Total Return v2 Index, while BKCG.L tracks MSCI World/Information Tech NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for SILG.L and 0.50% for BKCG.L.
Find the right allocation for SILG.L and BKCG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer