PSLV vs. GDX

In the year-to-date period, PSLV achieves a 30.20% return, which is significantly higher than GDX's 22.15% return. Over the past 10 years, PSLV has underperformed GDX with an annualized return of 4.80%, while GDX has yielded a comparatively higher 7.69% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV) and VanEck Vectors Gold Miners ETF (GDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current PSLV Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is comparable to the GDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSLV and GDX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

PSLV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%.

The maximum PSLV drawdown since its inception was -79.38%, roughly equal to the maximum GDX drawdown of -80.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSLV and GDX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV) is 9.53%, while VanEck Vectors Gold Miners ETF (GDX) has a volatility of 10.69%. This indicates that PSLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.