SIHY vs. XHYE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SIHY (Harbor Scientific Alpha High-Yield ETF) and XHYE (BondBloxx US High Yield Energy Sector ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds - SIHY tracks the ICE BofA US High Yield while XHYE tracks the ICE Diversified US Cash Pay High Yield Energy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, SIHY returned 9.35%/yr vs 8.50%/yr for XHYE. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SIHY charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XHYE.

Performance

SIHY vs. XHYE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Scientific Alpha High-Yield ETF (SIHY) and BondBloxx US High Yield Energy Sector ETF (XHYE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIHY achieves a 1.75% return, which is significantly lower than XHYE's 3.57% return.

SIHY

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 0.89%
• YTD: 1.75%
• 6M: 2.15%
• 1Y: 8.21%
• 3Y*: 9.35%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XHYE

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -0.19%
• YTD: 3.57%
• 6M: 3.82%
• 1Y: 8.97%
• 3Y*: 8.50%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIHY vs. XHYE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
SIHY Harbor Scientific Alpha High-Yield ETF	1.75%	8.13%	8.67%	13.31%	-3.53%
XHYE BondBloxx US High Yield Energy Sector ETF	3.57%	6.73%	7.46%	11.49%	-1.77%

Correlation

The correlation between SIHY and XHYE is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2022	0.82

Over the past year, the correlation between SIHY and XHYE has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.82, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

SIHY vs. XHYE - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SIHY	XHYE
Industrials	14.8%	-
Consumer Cyclical	13.9%	-
Energy	11.9%	49.2%
Technology	8.8%	0.3%
Financial Services	6.3%	-
Real Estate	5.3%	-
Basic Materials	3.2%	-
Communication Services	3.0%	-
Utilities	3.0%	-
Consumer Defensive	2.0%	-
Healthcare	1.5%	-

Return for Risk

SIHY vs. XHYE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIHY

SIHY Risk / Return Rank: 61
SIHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
SIHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
SIHY Omega Ratio Rank: 65
SIHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
SIHY Martin Ratio Rank: 61

XHYE

XHYE Risk / Return Rank: 94
XHYE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
XHYE Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
XHYE Omega Ratio Rank: 94
XHYE Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
XHYE Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIHY vs. XHYE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Scientific Alpha High-Yield ETF (SIHY) and BondBloxx US High Yield Energy Sector ETF (XHYE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SIHY	XHYE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.98	3.18	-1.20
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.08	5.13	-2.05
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.69	-0.30
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.60	8.50	-5.90
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.75	26.98	-16.22
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SIHY vs. XHYE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIHY Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is lower than the XHYE Sharpe Ratio of 3.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIHY and XHYE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SIHY	XHYE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.98	3.18	-1.20
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.64	0.84	-0.20

Drawdowns

SIHY vs. XHYE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIHY drawdown since its inception was -13.30%, which is greater than XHYE's maximum drawdown of -8.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIHY and XHYE.

Drawdown Indicators

	SIHY	XHYE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.30%	-8.87%	-4.43%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.17%	-1.21%	-1.96%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.36%	-6.40%	+1.04%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.12%	-0.36%	+0.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.78%	-1.42%	-1.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.76%	0.38%	+0.38%

Volatility

SIHY vs. XHYE - Volatility Comparison

Harbor Scientific Alpha High-Yield ETF (SIHY) has a higher volatility of 1.16% compared to BondBloxx US High Yield Energy Sector ETF (XHYE) at 0.56%. This indicates that SIHY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XHYE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SIHY	XHYE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.16%	0.56%	+0.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.09%	1.98%	+1.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.17%	3.24%	+0.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.57%	7.60%	-0.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.57%	7.60%	-0.03%

SIHY vs. XHYE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIHY has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than XHYE's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

SIHY vs. XHYE - Dividend Comparison

SIHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.26%, more than XHYE's 5.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
SIHY Harbor Scientific Alpha High-Yield ETF	7.26%	7.61%	7.54%	7.06%	6.31%	1.30%
XHYE BondBloxx US High Yield Energy Sector ETF	5.79%	6.55%	7.04%	6.46%	5.46%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SIHY and XHYE in my portfolio?

SIHY and XHYE have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, SIHY or XHYE?

SIHY has higher volatility (1.16%) compared to XHYE (0.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIHY dropped -13.30% vs XHYE's -8.87%.

Which ETF is better, SIHY or XHYE?

On 3-year performance, SIHY leads with 9.35% vs 8.50% for XHYE. On fees, XHYE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, XHYE has been the lower-risk option at 0.56%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, SIHY or XHYE?

Over the 3-year period, SIHY has performed better with a 9.35% return vs 8.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, SIHY or XHYE?

XHYE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for SIHY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SIHY or XHYE?

SIHY has the higher dividend yield at 7.26%, compared with 5.79% for XHYE.

What is the main difference between SIHY and XHYE?

SIHY tracks ICE BofA US High Yield, while XHYE tracks ICE Diversified US Cash Pay High Yield Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: Harbor and BondBloxx. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for SIHY and 0.35% for XHYE.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XHYE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.18 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.