PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SIHAX vs. SECIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SIHAX vs. SECIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Guggenheim High Yield Fund (SIHAX) and Guggenheim Large Cap Value Fund (SECIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIHAX achieves a 0.80% return, which is significantly lower than SECIX's 7.93% return. Over the past 10 years, SIHAX has underperformed SECIX with an annualized return of 4.66%, while SECIX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.70% annualized return.


SIHAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.62%
YTD
0.80%
6M
1.33%
1Y
4.96%
3Y*
7.15%
5Y*
3.30%
10Y*
4.66%

SECIX

1D
0.81%
1M
4.13%
YTD
7.93%
6M
8.05%
1Y
21.73%
3Y*
11.67%
5Y*
7.43%
10Y*
9.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIHAX vs. SECIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SIHAX
Guggenheim High Yield Fund
0.80%6.84%6.93%10.74%-10.51%4.36%4.55%11.26%-3.17%6.91%
SECIX
Guggenheim Large Cap Value Fund
7.93%13.92%3.94%9.03%-1.58%27.12%2.60%21.44%-10.05%15.33%

Correlation

The correlation between SIHAX and SECIX is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1997

0.31

Over the past year, SIHAX and SECIX have become more correlated (0.52) than their long-term average of 0.31, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SIHAX vs. SECIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIHAX
SIHAX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
SIHAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIHAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIHAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
SIHAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIHAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

SECIX
SECIX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
SECIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SECIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
SECIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
SECIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
SECIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIHAX vs. SECIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guggenheim High Yield Fund (SIHAX) and Guggenheim Large Cap Value Fund (SECIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SIHAXSECIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.39

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.78

3.50

-1.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.50

13.14

-4.63

SIHAX vs. SECIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIHAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the SECIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIHAX and SECIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SIHAXSECIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.61

2.26

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

0.45

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.02

0.52

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.29

0.26

+1.03

Drawdowns

SIHAX vs. SECIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIHAX drawdown since its inception was -36.72%, smaller than the maximum SECIX drawdown of -62.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIHAX and SECIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SIHAXSECIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.72%

-62.58%

+25.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.86%

-6.47%

+3.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.40%

-23.37%

+19.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.95%

-23.37%

+9.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.31%

-38.54%

+19.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.62%

-16.48%

+13.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.60%

1.72%

-1.12%

Volatility

SIHAX vs. SECIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Guggenheim High Yield Fund (SIHAX) is 1.14%, while Guggenheim Large Cap Value Fund (SECIX) has a volatility of 2.53%. This indicates that SIHAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SECIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SIHAXSECIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.14%

2.53%

-1.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.57%

7.30%

-4.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.17%

9.98%

-6.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.39%

16.61%

-12.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.60%

18.62%

-14.02%

SIHAX vs. SECIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIHAX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than SECIX's 1.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

SIHAX vs. SECIX - Dividend Comparison

SIHAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.32%, less than SECIX's 13.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SECIX
Guggenheim Large Cap Value Fund
13.49%14.56%3.80%12.08%9.42%6.96%7.12%7.69%6.34%8.25%3.23%8.36%
SIHAX
Guggenheim High Yield Fund
6.32%6.39%5.45%4.91%4.75%3.70%4.79%5.44%6.86%5.53%6.09%7.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


SIHAX and SECIX have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SECIX has higher volatility (2.53%) compared to SIHAX (1.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIHAX dropped -36.72% vs SECIX's -62.58%.

SECIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SIHAX and SECIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer