PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SIHAX vs. PIAMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SIHAX vs. PIAMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Guggenheim High Yield Fund (SIHAX) and PIA High Yield (MACS) Fund (PIAMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with SIHAX having a 0.80% return and PIAMX slightly lower at 0.79%.


SIHAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.62%
YTD
0.80%
6M
1.33%
1Y
4.96%
3Y*
7.15%
5Y*
3.30%
10Y*
4.66%

PIAMX

1D
-0.12%
1M
0.71%
YTD
0.79%
6M
1.23%
1Y
3.95%
3Y*
7.53%
5Y*
4.14%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIHAX vs. PIAMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SIHAX
Guggenheim High Yield Fund
0.80%6.84%6.93%10.74%-10.51%4.36%4.55%11.26%-3.34%
PIAMX
PIA High Yield (MACS) Fund
0.79%2.34%11.23%16.38%-10.93%7.82%9.05%11.77%-2.63%

Correlation

The correlation between SIHAX and PIAMX is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2018

0.71

The correlation between SIHAX and PIAMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SIHAX vs. PIAMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIHAX
SIHAX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
SIHAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIHAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIHAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
SIHAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIHAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

PIAMX
PIAMX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
PIAMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PIAMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
PIAMX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
PIAMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
PIAMX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIHAX vs. PIAMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guggenheim High Yield Fund (SIHAX) and PIA High Yield (MACS) Fund (PIAMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SIHAXPIAMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.27

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.78

1.12

+0.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.50

3.37

+5.13

SIHAX vs. PIAMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIHAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the PIAMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIHAX and PIAMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SIHAXPIAMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.61

1.35

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

1.03

-0.27

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.29

1.22

+0.07

Drawdowns

SIHAX vs. PIAMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIHAX drawdown since its inception was -36.72%, which is greater than PIAMX's maximum drawdown of -18.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIHAX and PIAMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SIHAXPIAMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.72%

-18.15%

-18.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.86%

-3.75%

+0.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.40%

-6.17%

+2.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.95%

-13.92%

-0.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.55%

+0.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.62%

-2.34%

-0.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.60%

1.25%

-0.65%

Volatility

SIHAX vs. PIAMX - Volatility Comparison

Guggenheim High Yield Fund (SIHAX) has a higher volatility of 1.14% compared to PIA High Yield (MACS) Fund (PIAMX) at 0.73%. This indicates that SIHAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PIAMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SIHAXPIAMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.14%

0.73%

+0.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.57%

2.44%

+0.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.17%

3.12%

+0.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.39%

4.04%

+0.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.60%

4.23%

+0.37%

SIHAX vs. PIAMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIHAX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than PIAMX's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

SIHAX vs. PIAMX - Dividend Comparison

SIHAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.32%, less than PIAMX's 7.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PIAMX
PIA High Yield (MACS) Fund
7.90%9.12%8.49%8.12%7.99%8.64%6.63%6.96%7.14%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SIHAX
Guggenheim High Yield Fund
6.32%6.39%5.45%4.91%4.75%3.70%4.79%5.44%6.86%5.53%6.09%7.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


SIHAX and PIAMX have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SIHAX has higher volatility (1.14%) compared to PIAMX (0.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIHAX dropped -36.72% vs PIAMX's -18.15%.

SIHAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.61 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SIHAX and PIAMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer