SIHAX vs. FQTIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Guggenheim High Yield Fund (SIHAX) and Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I (FQTIX).
SIHAX is managed by Guggenheim. It was launched on Aug 5, 1996. FQTIX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Jun 3, 2019.
Performance
SIHAX vs. FQTIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SIHAX vs. FQTIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIHAX Guggenheim High Yield Fund | -1.76% | 6.84% | 6.93% | 10.74% | -10.51% | 4.36% | 4.55% | 5.26% |
FQTIX Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I | 1.02% | 7.51% | 8.03% | 13.44% | -14.39% | 8.51% | 3.68% | 4.11% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIHAX achieves a -1.76% return, which is significantly lower than FQTIX's 1.02% return.
SIHAX
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- -1.72%
- YTD
- -1.76%
- 6M
- -0.57%
- 1Y
- 4.38%
- 3Y*
- 6.42%
- 5Y*
- 3.06%
- 10Y*
- 4.84%
FQTIX
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- -1.34%
- YTD
- 1.02%
- 6M
- 3.05%
- 1Y
- 9.98%
- 3Y*
- 8.04%
- 5Y*
- 3.70%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SIHAX vs. FQTIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SIHAX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is higher than FQTIX's 0.00% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SIHAX vs. FQTIX — Risk / Return Rank
SIHAX
FQTIX
SIHAX vs. FQTIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Guggenheim High Yield Fund (SIHAX) and Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I (FQTIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SIHAX | FQTIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.32 | 2.68 | -1.35 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.96 | 3.64 | -1.69 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.64 | -0.35 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.61 | 4.19 | -2.58 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.54 | 18.41 | -11.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SIHAX | FQTIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.32 | 2.68 | -1.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 0.63 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.06 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.28 | 0.56 | +0.72 |
Correlation
The correlation between SIHAX and FQTIX is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SIHAX vs. FQTIX - Dividend Comparison
SIHAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.97%, less than FQTIX's 7.00% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIHAX Guggenheim High Yield Fund | 5.97% | 6.39% | 5.45% | 4.91% | 4.75% | 3.70% | 4.79% | 5.44% | 6.86% | 5.53% | 6.09% | 7.53% |
FQTIX Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I | 7.00% | 5.70% | 7.86% | 7.64% | 8.10% | 7.15% | 6.89% | 5.63% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
SIHAX vs. FQTIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIHAX drawdown since its inception was -36.72%, which is greater than FQTIX's maximum drawdown of -24.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIHAX and FQTIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIHAX | FQTIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.72% | -24.62% | -12.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.86% | -2.41% | -0.45% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.95% | -18.81% | +4.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.31% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.16% | -1.47% | -0.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.64% | -4.42% | +1.78% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.71% | 0.55% | +0.16% |
Volatility
SIHAX vs. FQTIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Guggenheim High Yield Fund (SIHAX) is 1.42%, while Franklin Templeton SMACS: Series I (FQTIX) has a volatility of 1.68%. This indicates that SIHAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FQTIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SIHAX | FQTIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.42% | 1.68% | -0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.20% | 2.43% | -0.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.44% | 3.87% | -0.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.33% | 5.93% | -1.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.59% | 7.80% | -3.21% |