SIFI vs. VLLU
SIFI (Harbor Scientific Alpha Income ETF) and VLLU (Harbor AlphaEdge Large Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SIFI is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by Harbor, while VLLU is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Harbor AlphaEdge Large Cap Value Index. SIFI is actively managed, while VLLU is passively managed. Over the past year, SIFI returned 7.56% vs 26.23% for VLLU. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SIFI charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for VLLU.
Performance
SIFI vs. VLLU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIFI achieves a 1.27% return, which is significantly lower than VLLU's 11.14% return.
SIFI
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 1.27%
- 6M
- 1.70%
- 1Y
- 7.56%
- 3Y*
- 7.19%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VLLU
- 1D
- 0.59%
- 1M
- 5.60%
- YTD
- 11.14%
- 6M
- 14.80%
- 1Y
- 26.23%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SIFI vs. VLLU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
SIFI Harbor Scientific Alpha Income ETF | 1.27% | 8.83% | -0.65% |
VLLU Harbor AlphaEdge Large Cap Value ETF | 11.14% | 17.35% | 2.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between SIFI and VLLU is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2024 | 0.42 |
SIFI vs. VLLU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SIFI
VLLU
Industrials
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
Healthcare
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
Industrials
SIFI
VLLU
Technology
SIFI
VLLU
Consumer Cyclical
SIFI
VLLU
Energy
SIFI
VLLU
Real Estate
SIFI
VLLU
-
Financial Services
SIFI
VLLU
Healthcare
SIFI
VLLU
Communication Services
SIFI
VLLU
Consumer Defensive
SIFI
VLLU
Utilities
SIFI
VLLU
-
Basic Materials
SIFI
VLLU
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SIFI vs. VLLU — Risk / Return Rank
SIFI
VLLU
SIFI vs. VLLU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Scientific Alpha Income ETF (SIFI) and Harbor AlphaEdge Large Cap Value ETF (VLLU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SIFI | VLLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.24 | 2.39 | -0.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.43 | 3.48 | -0.06 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.42 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.74 | 4.20 | -1.46 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.23 | 15.41 | -4.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SIFI | VLLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.24 | 2.39 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 1.24 | -0.77 |
Drawdowns
SIFI vs. VLLU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIFI drawdown since its inception was -14.68%, smaller than the maximum VLLU drawdown of -16.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIFI and VLLU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIFI | VLLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.68% | -16.62% | +1.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.71% | -6.33% | +3.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.46% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.06% | 0.00% | -0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.83% | -2.45% | -2.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.66% | 1.73% | -1.07% |
Volatility
SIFI vs. VLLU - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Harbor Scientific Alpha Income ETF (SIFI) is 1.03%, while Harbor AlphaEdge Large Cap Value ETF (VLLU) has a volatility of 3.66%. This indicates that SIFI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VLLU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SIFI | VLLU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.03% | 3.66% | -2.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.48% | 8.21% | -5.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.39% | 11.01% | -7.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.94% | 14.86% | -9.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.94% | 14.86% | -9.92% |
SIFI vs. VLLU - Expense Ratio Comparison
SIFI has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than VLLU's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
SIFI vs. VLLU - Dividend Comparison
SIFI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.44%, more than VLLU's 1.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIFI Harbor Scientific Alpha Income ETF | 6.44% | 6.57% | 5.87% | 5.71% | 3.88% | 0.86% |
VLLU Harbor AlphaEdge Large Cap Value ETF | 1.37% | 1.52% | 0.90% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SIFI and VLLU have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VLLU has higher volatility (3.66%) compared to SIFI (1.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIFI dropped -14.68% vs VLLU's -16.62%.
On 1-year performance, VLLU leads with 26.23% vs 7.56% for SIFI. On fees, VLLU is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, SIFI has been the lower-risk option at 1.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, VLLU has performed better with a 26.23% return vs 7.56%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VLLU is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SIFI.
SIFI has the higher dividend yield at 6.44%, compared with 1.37% for VLLU.
SIFI is categorized as Multisector Bonds, while VLLU is Large Cap Value Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SIFI and 0.25% for VLLU.
VLLU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SIFI and VLLU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer