PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SIFAX vs. CONWX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

SIFAX vs. CONWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund (SIFAX) and Concorde Wealth Management Fund (CONWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

SIFAX vs. CONWX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SIFAX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund
9.34%7.82%4.08%-1.74%8.48%10.83%-1.59%5.68%-3.64%-1.96%
CONWX
Concorde Wealth Management Fund
8.18%11.95%13.58%0.20%-2.51%19.73%8.76%16.84%-1.95%7.17%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIFAX achieves a 9.34% return, which is significantly higher than CONWX's 8.18% return. Over the past 10 years, SIFAX has underperformed CONWX with an annualized return of 3.95%, while CONWX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.62% annualized return.


SIFAX

1D
0.46%
1M
2.61%
YTD
9.34%
6M
11.23%
1Y
11.09%
3Y*
7.29%
5Y*
6.95%
10Y*
3.95%

CONWX

1D
-0.62%
1M
-1.70%
YTD
8.18%
6M
11.51%
1Y
17.28%
3Y*
12.45%
5Y*
7.53%
10Y*
8.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


SIFAX vs. CONWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIFAX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than CONWX's 1.41% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

SIFAX vs. CONWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIFAX
SIFAX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
SIFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
SIFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

CONWX
CONWX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
CONWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CONWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
CONWX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
CONWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
CONWX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIFAX vs. CONWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund (SIFAX) and Concorde Wealth Management Fund (CONWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SIFAXCONWXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.19

1.70

+0.48

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.07

2.36

+0.70

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.37

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.74

1.99

+1.74

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.56

11.30

-1.73

SIFAX vs. CONWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIFAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is comparable to the CONWX Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIFAX and CONWX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SIFAXCONWXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.19

1.70

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.27

0.74

+0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

0.78

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.78

-0.42

Correlation

The correlation between SIFAX and CONWX is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

SIFAX vs. CONWX - Dividend Comparison

SIFAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.16%, more than CONWX's 3.41% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SIFAX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund
4.16%4.55%3.25%3.82%11.90%7.89%1.45%1.49%1.90%1.39%1.15%0.48%
CONWX
Concorde Wealth Management Fund
3.41%3.69%10.55%2.16%7.85%3.63%3.86%2.16%5.09%2.48%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

SIFAX vs. CONWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIFAX drawdown since its inception was -23.62%, smaller than the maximum CONWX drawdown of -26.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIFAX and CONWX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


SIFAXCONWXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.62%

-26.09%

+2.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.07%

-8.60%

+5.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.32%

-12.49%

+4.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.69%

-26.09%

+11.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-2.03%

+2.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.65%

-2.78%

-5.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.25%

1.52%

-0.27%

Volatility

SIFAX vs. CONWX - Volatility Comparison

SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund (SIFAX) and Concorde Wealth Management Fund (CONWX) have volatilities of 2.03% and 2.12%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


SIFAXCONWXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.03%

2.12%

-0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.91%

5.43%

-1.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.30%

10.70%

-5.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.50%

10.26%

-4.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.16%

11.15%

-5.99%