PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SIEMX vs. SLCAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SIEMX vs. SLCAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Institutional International Trust Emerging Markets Equity Fund (SIEMX) and SEI Institutional Investments Trust Large Cap Fund (SLCAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIEMX achieves a 29.32% return, which is significantly higher than SLCAX's 11.22% return. Over the past 10 years, SIEMX has underperformed SLCAX with an annualized return of 10.09%, while SLCAX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.38% annualized return.


SIEMX

1D
1.44%
1M
9.93%
YTD
29.32%
6M
32.48%
1Y
58.10%
3Y*
24.17%
5Y*
7.33%
10Y*
10.09%

SLCAX

1D
0.14%
1M
4.28%
YTD
11.22%
6M
11.92%
1Y
27.43%
3Y*
20.92%
5Y*
11.99%
10Y*
13.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SIEMX vs. SLCAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SIEMX
SEI Institutional International Trust Emerging Markets Equity Fund
29.32%35.90%4.31%9.81%-21.51%-1.85%17.03%19.76%-18.67%37.28%
SLCAX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Large Cap Fund
11.22%17.94%20.89%18.93%-14.21%26.47%11.66%28.06%-6.91%20.99%

Correlation

The correlation between SIEMX and SLCAX is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.56

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2007

0.66

The correlation between SIEMX and SLCAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (3 years) to 0.66 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SIEMX vs. SLCAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SIEMX
SIEMX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
SIEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
SIEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

SLCAX
SLCAX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
SLCAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLCAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLCAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
SLCAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLCAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SIEMX vs. SLCAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Institutional International Trust Emerging Markets Equity Fund (SIEMX) and SEI Institutional Investments Trust Large Cap Fund (SLCAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SIEMXSLCAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.49

2.52

+0.97

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.30

3.52

+0.78

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.66

1.46

+0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.53

3.50

+1.02

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

17.66

16.15

+1.51

SIEMX vs. SLCAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIEMX Sharpe Ratio is 3.49, which is higher than the SLCAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIEMX and SLCAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SIEMXSLCAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.49

2.52

+0.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

0.58

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

0.67

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.45

-0.16

Drawdowns

SIEMX vs. SLCAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIEMX drawdown since its inception was -65.22%, which is greater than SLCAX's maximum drawdown of -56.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIEMX and SLCAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SIEMXSLCAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.22%

-56.24%

-8.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.59%

-8.08%

-5.51%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.41%

-22.33%

+5.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.68%

-33.95%

-3.73%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.76%

-35.87%

-4.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.45%

-10.57%

-10.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.42%

1.75%

+1.67%

Volatility

SIEMX vs. SLCAX - Volatility Comparison

SEI Institutional International Trust Emerging Markets Equity Fund (SIEMX) has a higher volatility of 7.34% compared to SEI Institutional Investments Trust Large Cap Fund (SLCAX) at 2.61%. This indicates that SIEMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLCAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SIEMXSLCAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.34%

2.61%

+4.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.85%

8.60%

+6.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.66%

11.23%

+6.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.67%

20.79%

-4.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.50%

20.11%

-2.61%

SIEMX vs. SLCAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIEMX has a 1.71% expense ratio, which is higher than SLCAX's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

SIEMX vs. SLCAX - Dividend Comparison

SIEMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.33%, less than SLCAX's 33.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SIEMX
SEI Institutional International Trust Emerging Markets Equity Fund
3.33%4.30%3.20%1.58%2.08%9.55%0.53%1.09%0.63%1.26%0.80%0.81%
SLCAX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Large Cap Fund
33.73%37.47%12.36%7.46%13.40%20.97%6.89%11.19%31.44%23.33%5.33%17.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


SIEMX and SLCAX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SIEMX has higher volatility (7.34%) compared to SLCAX (2.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIEMX dropped -65.22% vs SLCAX's -56.24%.

SIEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.49 vs 2.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SIEMX and SLCAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer