SIDNX vs. APHIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Hartford Schroders International Multi-Cap Value Fund (SIDNX) and Artisan International Fund Institutional Class (APHIX).
SIDNX is managed by Hartford. It was launched on Aug 29, 2006. APHIX is an actively managed fund by Artisan Partners. It was launched on Jul 1, 1997.
Performance
SIDNX vs. APHIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SIDNX vs. APHIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIDNX Hartford Schroders International Multi-Cap Value Fund | 1.99% | 45.41% | 5.93% | 13.72% | -11.75% | 13.87% | 1.04% | 18.58% | -15.43% | 23.29% |
APHIX Artisan International Fund Institutional Class | 3.79% | 36.49% | 10.89% | 14.52% | -19.35% | 9.10% | 7.84% | 29.43% | -10.81% | 31.25% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SIDNX achieves a 1.99% return, which is significantly lower than APHIX's 3.79% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with SIDNX having a 9.06% annualized return and APHIX not far ahead at 9.34%.
SIDNX
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- -10.65%
- YTD
- 1.99%
- 6M
- 9.58%
- 1Y
- 35.16%
- 3Y*
- 18.99%
- 5Y*
- 10.59%
- 10Y*
- 9.06%
APHIX
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- -8.93%
- YTD
- 3.79%
- 6M
- 5.56%
- 1Y
- 29.58%
- 3Y*
- 18.43%
- 5Y*
- 9.55%
- 10Y*
- 9.34%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SIDNX vs. APHIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SIDNX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is lower than APHIX's 0.96% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SIDNX vs. APHIX — Risk / Return Rank
SIDNX
APHIX
SIDNX vs. APHIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Hartford Schroders International Multi-Cap Value Fund (SIDNX) and Artisan International Fund Institutional Class (APHIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SIDNX | APHIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.23 | 1.86 | +0.36 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.75 | 2.39 | +0.36 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.35 | +0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.90 | 2.53 | +0.37 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.47 | 10.66 | +0.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SIDNX | APHIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.23 | 1.86 | +0.36 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | 0.62 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | 0.58 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.29 | +0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between SIDNX and APHIX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SIDNX vs. APHIX - Dividend Comparison
SIDNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.52%, less than APHIX's 21.80% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SIDNX Hartford Schroders International Multi-Cap Value Fund | 6.52% | 6.65% | 2.06% | 2.92% | 4.14% | 2.67% | 2.24% | 3.29% | 5.86% | 3.31% | 1.30% | 3.22% |
APHIX Artisan International Fund Institutional Class | 21.80% | 22.63% | 10.37% | 2.10% | 2.84% | 23.52% | 3.45% | 5.44% | 10.02% | 0.91% | 1.50% | 0.73% |
Drawdowns
SIDNX vs. APHIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SIDNX drawdown since its inception was -62.41%, smaller than the maximum APHIX drawdown of -68.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIDNX and APHIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SIDNX | APHIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.41% | -68.47% | +6.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.25% | -9.77% | -1.48% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.59% | -33.73% | +7.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.11% | -33.73% | -7.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.82% | -9.77% | -1.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.22% | -23.20% | +11.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.86% | 2.59% | +0.27% |
Volatility
SIDNX vs. APHIX - Volatility Comparison
Hartford Schroders International Multi-Cap Value Fund (SIDNX) has a higher volatility of 6.91% compared to Artisan International Fund Institutional Class (APHIX) at 6.04%. This indicates that SIDNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than APHIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SIDNX | APHIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.91% | 6.04% | +0.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.33% | 10.13% | +0.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.45% | 15.33% | +0.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.35% | 15.61% | -1.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.49% | 16.16% | -0.67% |