PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SIDCX vs. SBDAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SIDCX vs. SBDAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Institutional Investments Trust Intermediate Duration Credit Fund (SIDCX) and SEI Tax Exempt Trust California Municipal Bond Fund (SBDAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SIDCX achieves a -0.95% return, which is significantly higher than SBDAX's -1.18% return. Over the past 10 years, SIDCX has outperformed SBDAX with an annualized return of 1.88%, while SBDAX has yielded a comparatively lower 0.99% annualized return.


SIDCX

1D
0.12%
1M
-1.70%
6M
-1.23%
YTD
-0.95%
1Y
1.43%
3Y*
3.84%
5Y*
-0.80%
10Y*
1.88%
ALL TIME*
2.13%

SBDAX

1D
-0.10%
1M
-1.74%
6M
-2.22%
YTD
-1.18%
1Y
2.37%
3Y*
2.34%
5Y*
-0.05%
10Y*
0.99%
ALL TIME*
2.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

SIDCX vs. SBDAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SIDCX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Intermediate Duration Credit Fund
-0.95%7.40%1.92%6.58%-15.78%-1.66%10.68%12.43%-1.61%5.66%
SBDAX
SEI Tax Exempt Trust California Municipal Bond Fund
-1.18%5.70%0.02%4.02%-7.30%-0.55%3.76%5.90%0.87%3.74%

Correlation

The correlation between SIDCX and SBDAX is 0.58, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.55

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.51

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2015

0.52

The correlation between SIDCX and SBDAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.51 (10 years) to 0.63 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SIDCX vs. SBDAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SIDCX
SIDCX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
SIDCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIDCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIDCX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
SIDCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIDCX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

SBDAX
SBDAX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
SBDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SBDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
SBDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
SBDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
SBDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SIDCX vs. SBDAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Institutional Investments Trust Intermediate Duration Credit Fund (SIDCX) and SEI Tax Exempt Trust California Municipal Bond Fund (SBDAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SIDCXSBDAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.28

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.82

0.90

-0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.20

2.08

+0.12

SIDCX vs. SBDAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SIDCX Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is lower than the SBDAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SIDCX and SBDAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SIDCX vs. SBDAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SIDCX drawdown since its inception was -21.47%, which is greater than SBDAX's maximum drawdown of -11.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SIDCX and SBDAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SIDCXSBDAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.47%

-11.86%

-9.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.10%

-3.40%

+0.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.31%

-4.09%

-1.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.39%

-11.86%

-9.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.47%

-11.86%

-9.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.29%

-3.21%

-1.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.19%

-1.87%

-3.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.15%

1.47%

-0.32%

Volatility

SIDCX vs. SBDAX - Volatility Comparison

SEI Institutional Investments Trust Intermediate Duration Credit Fund (SIDCX) has a higher volatility of 1.09% compared to SEI Tax Exempt Trust California Municipal Bond Fund (SBDAX) at 0.77%. This indicates that SIDCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SBDAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SIDCXSBDAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.09%

0.77%

+0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.35%

2.00%

+1.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.22%

2.40%

+1.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.41%

3.21%

+3.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.71%

3.56%

+2.15%

SIDCX vs. SBDAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SIDCX has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than SBDAX's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

SIDCX vs. SBDAX - Dividend Comparison

SIDCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.39%, more than SBDAX's 2.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SBDAX
SEI Tax Exempt Trust California Municipal Bond Fund
2.09%2.74%1.78%1.26%1.38%1.35%1.87%2.21%1.98%1.99%2.23%2.79%
SIDCX
SEI Institutional Investments Trust Intermediate Duration Credit Fund
4.39%4.61%4.20%2.99%2.36%3.57%4.93%3.07%3.16%2.77%2.75%1.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


SIDCX and SBDAX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SIDCX has higher volatility (1.09%) compared to SBDAX (0.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SIDCX dropped -21.47% vs SBDAX's -11.86%.

SBDAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.27 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SIDCX and SBDAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer