SHYL vs. NHYB
SHYL (Xtrackers Short Duration High Yield Bond ETF) and NHYB (Nuveen High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds - SHYL tracks the Solactive USD High Yield Corporates Total Market 0-5 Year Index while NHYB tracks the ICE BofA BB-B US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SHYL charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for NHYB.
Performance
SHYL vs. NHYB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SHYL achieves a 1.35% return, which is significantly lower than NHYB's 1.93% return.
SHYL
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 1.35%
- 6M
- 1.42%
- 1Y
- 5.22%
- 3Y*
- 8.43%
- 5Y*
- 4.82%
- 10Y*
- —
NHYB
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.54%
- YTD
- 1.93%
- 6M
- 1.85%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SHYL vs. NHYB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SHYL Xtrackers Short Duration High Yield Bond ETF | 1.35% | 1.22% |
NHYB Nuveen High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 1.93% | 1.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between SHYL and NHYB is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2025 | 0.84 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SHYL vs. NHYB — Risk / Return Rank
SHYL
NHYB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SHYL vs. NHYB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Short Duration High Yield Bond ETF (SHYL) and Nuveen High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (NHYB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SHYL | NHYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.29 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.88 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SHYL vs. NHYB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SHYL drawdown since its inception was -19.26%, which is greater than NHYB's maximum drawdown of -2.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHYL and NHYB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SHYL | NHYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.26% | -2.40% | -16.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.59% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.19% | -0.18% | -0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.53% | -0.36% | -1.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.41% | — | — |
Volatility
SHYL vs. NHYB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SHYL | NHYB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.74% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.50% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.21% | 3.63% | -0.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.85% | 3.63% | +2.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.67% | 3.63% | +3.04% |
SHYL vs. NHYB - Expense Ratio Comparison
SHYL has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than NHYB's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SHYL vs. NHYB - Dividend Comparison
SHYL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.92%, more than NHYB's 4.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NHYB Nuveen High Yield Corporate Bond ETF | 4.24% | 1.28% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SHYL Xtrackers Short Duration High Yield Bond ETF | 6.92% | 7.02% | 7.26% | 6.60% | 5.52% | 4.65% | 6.16% | 5.93% | 5.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SHYL and NHYB have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NHYB is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NHYB is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SHYL.
SHYL has the higher dividend yield at 6.92%, compared with 4.24% for NHYB.
SHYL tracks Solactive USD High Yield Corporates Total Market 0-5 Year Index, while NHYB tracks ICE BofA BB-B US Cash Pay High Yield Constrained Index. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and Nuveen. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SHYL and 0.08% for NHYB.
Find the right allocation for SHYL and NHYB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer