PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SHYL vs. IBHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SHYL vs. IBHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Xtrackers Short Duration High Yield Bond ETF (SHYL) and iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHYL achieves a 1.35% return, which is significantly higher than IBHG's 1.10% return.


SHYL

1D
-0.01%
1M
0.36%
YTD
1.35%
6M
1.42%
1Y
5.22%
3Y*
8.43%
5Y*
4.82%
10Y*

IBHG

1D
-0.05%
1M
-0.04%
YTD
1.10%
6M
1.22%
1Y
4.15%
3Y*
7.61%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SHYL vs. IBHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
SHYL
Xtrackers Short Duration High Yield Bond ETF
1.35%7.78%8.52%11.39%-5.21%0.95%
IBHG
iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF
1.10%6.90%7.42%11.27%-8.88%0.93%

Correlation

The correlation between SHYL and IBHG is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2021

0.84

The correlation between SHYL and IBHG shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.83 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SHYL vs. IBHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHYL
SHYL Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
SHYL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHYL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHYL Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
SHYL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHYL Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

IBHG
IBHG Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
IBHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBHG Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
IBHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBHG Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHYL vs. IBHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Xtrackers Short Duration High Yield Bond ETF (SHYL) and iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SHYLIBHGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.38

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.29

5.74

-2.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.88

20.91

-8.03

SHYL vs. IBHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHYL Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the IBHG Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHYL and IBHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SHYL vs. IBHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHYL drawdown since its inception was -19.26%, which is greater than IBHG's maximum drawdown of -13.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHYL and IBHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SHYLIBHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.26%

-13.85%

-5.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.59%

-0.73%

-0.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.73%

-3.39%

-1.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.19%

-0.09%

-0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.53%

-2.64%

+1.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.41%

0.20%

+0.21%

Volatility

SHYL vs. IBHG - Volatility Comparison

Xtrackers Short Duration High Yield Bond ETF (SHYL) has a higher volatility of 0.74% compared to iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHG) at 0.38%. This indicates that SHYL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SHYLIBHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.74%

0.38%

+0.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.50%

1.51%

+0.99%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.21%

2.09%

+1.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.85%

6.33%

-0.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.67%

6.33%

+0.34%

SHYL vs. IBHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

SHYL has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than IBHG's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

SHYL vs. IBHG - Dividend Comparison

SHYL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.92%, more than IBHG's 6.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
IBHG
iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF
6.07%6.33%7.02%6.66%5.62%2.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SHYL
Xtrackers Short Duration High Yield Bond ETF
6.92%7.02%7.26%6.60%5.52%4.65%6.16%5.93%5.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


SHYL and IBHG have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SHYL has higher volatility (0.74%) compared to IBHG (0.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHYL dropped -19.26% vs IBHG's -13.85%.

On 3-year performance, SHYL leads with 8.43% vs 7.61% for IBHG. On fees, SHYL is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, IBHG has been the lower-risk option at 0.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, SHYL has performed better with a 8.43% return vs 7.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SHYL is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for IBHG.

SHYL has the higher dividend yield at 6.92%, compared with 6.07% for IBHG.

SHYL tracks Solactive USD High Yield Corporates Total Market 0-5 Year Index, while IBHG tracks Bloomberg 2027 Term High Yield and Income Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: Deutsche Bank and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SHYL and 0.35% for IBHG.

IBHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SHYL and IBHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer