PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SHYG.L vs. QYLE.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SHYG.L vs. QYLE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (SHYG.L) and Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF D (QYLE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SHYG.L is traded in GBP, while QYLE.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the QYLE.DE values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHYG.L achieves a -2.59% return, which is significantly lower than QYLE.DE's 5.65% return.


SHYG.L

1D
0.24%
1M
0.61%
YTD
-2.59%
6M
-2.05%
1Y
0.86%
3Y*
4.65%
5Y*
1.78%
10Y*
3.56%

QYLE.DE

1D
-0.93%
1M
2.66%
YTD
5.65%
6M
6.41%
1Y
19.41%
3Y*
12.89%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SHYG.L vs. QYLE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SHYG.L
iShares EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
-2.59%7.69%0.97%9.31%2.71%
QYLE.DE
Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF D
5.65%-2.82%31.38%27.42%-3.16%

Correlation

The correlation between SHYG.L and QYLE.DE is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 24, 2022

0.20

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SHYG.L vs. QYLE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHYG.L
SHYG.L Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
SHYG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHYG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHYG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
SHYG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHYG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

QYLE.DE
QYLE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
QYLE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QYLE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
QYLE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
QYLE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
QYLE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHYG.L vs. QYLE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (SHYG.L) and Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF D (QYLE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SHYG.LQYLE.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.37

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.11

5.18

-5.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.29

15.03

-14.74

SHYG.L vs. QYLE.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHYG.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.12, which is lower than the QYLE.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHYG.L and QYLE.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SHYG.LQYLE.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

2.11

-1.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

1.19

-0.79

Drawdowns

SHYG.L vs. QYLE.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHYG.L drawdown since its inception was -22.96%, roughly equal to the maximum QYLE.DE drawdown of -22.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHYG.L and QYLE.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SHYG.LQYLE.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.96%

-22.77%

-0.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.43%

-3.71%

-2.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.43%

-22.77%

+16.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.57%

-2.13%

-1.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.87%

-4.79%

-0.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.49%

1.28%

+1.21%

Volatility

SHYG.L vs. QYLE.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (SHYG.L) is 1.44%, while Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF D (QYLE.DE) has a volatility of 2.62%. This indicates that SHYG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QYLE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SHYG.LQYLE.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.44%

2.62%

-1.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.92%

6.01%

-1.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.28%

9.14%

-2.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.15%

12.97%

-5.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.69%

12.97%

-4.28%

SHYG.L vs. QYLE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

SHYG.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than QYLE.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

SHYG.L vs. QYLE.DE - Dividend Comparison

SHYG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QYLE.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.84%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QYLE.DE
Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call UCITS ETF D
8.84%10.67%15.00%20.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SHYG.L
iShares EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
0.00%2.75%6.24%5.39%3.58%3.13%3.66%3.86%3.65%3.74%3.83%4.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


SHYG.L and QYLE.DE have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QYLE.DE is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QYLE.DE is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SHYG.L.

SHYG.L is categorized as European High Yield Bonds, while QYLE.DE is Nasdaq-100. SHYG.L tracks Bloomberg Pan Euro HY Euro TR EUR, while QYLE.DE tracks Cboe Nasdaq-100 BuyWrite. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SHYG.L and 0.45% for QYLE.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SHYG.L and QYLE.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer