PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SHYG.L vs. FLOA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SHYG.L vs. FLOA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (SHYG.L) and iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLOA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SHYG.L is traded in GBP, while FLOA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FLOA.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHYG.L achieves a -1.50% return, which is significantly lower than FLOA.L's 2.46% return.


SHYG.L

1D
0.06%
1M
-1.75%
6M
-0.71%
YTD
-1.50%
1Y
1.30%
3Y*
5.85%
5Y*
2.55%
10Y*
3.18%

FLOA.L

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.10%
6M
1.40%
YTD
2.46%
1Y
4.13%
3Y*
4.41%
5Y*
4.78%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SHYG.L vs. FLOA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SHYG.L
iShares EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
-1.50%10.52%0.97%9.30%-4.42%-3.69%6.61%4.45%-0.97%
FLOA.L
iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
2.63%-2.58%8.28%1.32%13.40%1.37%-2.10%0.21%11.95%

Correlation

The correlation between SHYG.L and FLOA.L is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2018

0.21

The correlation between SHYG.L and FLOA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (3 years) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SHYG.L vs. FLOA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHYG.L
SHYG.L Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
SHYG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHYG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHYG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
SHYG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHYG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

FLOA.L
FLOA.L Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
FLOA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLOA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLOA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
FLOA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLOA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHYG.L vs. FLOA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (SHYG.L) and iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLOA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SHYG.LFLOA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.11

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.34

0.83

-0.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.01

2.32

-1.31

SHYG.L vs. FLOA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHYG.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is lower than the FLOA.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHYG.L and FLOA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SHYG.L vs. FLOA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHYG.L drawdown since its inception was -22.97%, which is greater than FLOA.L's maximum drawdown of -14.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHYG.L and FLOA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SHYG.LFLOA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.97%

-14.83%

-8.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.78%

-4.95%

+1.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.78%

-9.63%

+5.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.33%

-14.83%

-0.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.25%

-3.25%

+1.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.20%

-5.92%

+0.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.28%

1.77%

-0.49%

Volatility

SHYG.L vs. FLOA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (SHYG.L) is 1.09%, while iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (FLOA.L) has a volatility of 1.70%. This indicates that SHYG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLOA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SHYG.LFLOA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.09%

1.70%

-0.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.83%

5.21%

-1.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.80%

6.89%

-2.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.93%

8.65%

-1.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.39%

9.23%

-0.84%

SHYG.L vs. FLOA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SHYG.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than FLOA.L's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

SHYG.L vs. FLOA.L - Dividend Comparison

SHYG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.61%, while FLOA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLOA.L
iShares USD Floating Rate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SHYG.L
iShares EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
6.61%5.31%6.24%5.39%3.58%3.13%3.66%3.86%3.65%3.74%3.83%4.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


SHYG.L and FLOA.L have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, FLOA.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

FLOA.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SHYG.L.

SHYG.L is categorized as European High Yield Bonds, while FLOA.L is Corporate Bonds. SHYG.L tracks Bloomberg Pan Euro HY Euro TR EUR, while FLOA.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp Bond TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SHYG.L and 0.10% for FLOA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SHYG.L and FLOA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer