PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SHYG.L vs. CSP1.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SHYG.L vs. CSP1.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (SHYG.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SHYG.L is traded in GBP, while CSP1.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the CSP1.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHYG.L achieves a -2.59% return, which is significantly lower than CSP1.L's 10.55% return. Over the past 10 years, SHYG.L has underperformed CSP1.L with an annualized return of 3.56%, while CSP1.L has yielded a comparatively higher 16.07% annualized return.


SHYG.L

1D
0.24%
1M
1.24%
YTD
-2.59%
6M
-1.99%
1Y
0.73%
3Y*
4.65%
5Y*
1.78%
10Y*
3.56%

CSP1.L

1D
0.05%
1M
5.54%
YTD
10.55%
6M
10.48%
1Y
29.13%
3Y*
19.02%
5Y*
14.94%
10Y*
16.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SHYG.L vs. CSP1.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SHYG.L
iShares EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
-2.59%7.69%0.97%9.31%-4.42%-3.69%6.60%4.45%-2.62%8.25%
CSP1.L
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF
10.55%9.37%27.35%19.79%-9.05%31.07%13.65%26.42%0.01%10.83%

Correlation

The correlation between SHYG.L and CSP1.L is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2010

0.35

The correlation between SHYG.L and CSP1.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.29 (3 years) to 0.44 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SHYG.L vs. CSP1.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHYG.L
SHYG.L Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
SHYG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHYG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHYG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
SHYG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHYG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

CSP1.L
CSP1.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
CSP1.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSP1.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSP1.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
CSP1.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSP1.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHYG.L vs. CSP1.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (SHYG.L) and iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SHYG.LCSP1.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.61

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.51

-0.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.11

4.07

-3.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.29

14.99

-14.70

SHYG.L vs. CSP1.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHYG.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.12, which is lower than the CSP1.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHYG.L and CSP1.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SHYG.LCSP1.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

2.73

-2.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

1.04

-0.79

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

1.03

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

1.09

-0.69

Drawdowns

SHYG.L vs. CSP1.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHYG.L drawdown since its inception was -22.96%, smaller than the maximum CSP1.L drawdown of -25.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHYG.L and CSP1.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SHYG.LCSP1.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.96%

-25.48%

+2.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.43%

-7.12%

+0.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.43%

-20.77%

+14.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.33%

-20.77%

+5.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.96%

-25.48%

+2.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.57%

-0.24%

-3.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.87%

-3.32%

-1.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.49%

1.94%

+0.55%

Volatility

SHYG.L vs. CSP1.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Dist) (SHYG.L) is 1.44%, while iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF (CSP1.L) has a volatility of 2.62%. This indicates that SHYG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSP1.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SHYG.LCSP1.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.44%

2.62%

-1.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.92%

7.16%

-2.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.28%

10.62%

-4.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.15%

14.31%

-7.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.69%

15.57%

-6.88%

SHYG.L vs. CSP1.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SHYG.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than CSP1.L's 0.07% expense ratio.


Dividends

SHYG.L vs. CSP1.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither SHYG.L nor CSP1.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSP1.L
iShares Core S&P 500 UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SHYG.L
iShares EUR High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Dist)
0.00%2.75%6.24%5.39%3.58%3.13%3.66%3.86%3.65%3.74%3.83%4.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


SHYG.L and CSP1.L have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CSP1.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CSP1.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SHYG.L.

SHYG.L is categorized as European High Yield Bonds, while CSP1.L is S&P 500. SHYG.L tracks Bloomberg Pan Euro HY Euro TR EUR, while CSP1.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for SHYG.L and 0.07% for CSP1.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SHYG.L and CSP1.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer