PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SHYD vs. MOAT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SHYD vs. MOAT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Short High Yield Muni ETF (SHYD) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHYD achieves a 0.74% return, which is significantly higher than MOAT's -0.07% return. Over the past 10 years, SHYD has underperformed MOAT with an annualized return of 2.02%, while MOAT has yielded a comparatively higher 13.40% annualized return.


SHYD

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.48%
YTD
0.74%
6M
1.44%
1Y
5.37%
3Y*
4.40%
5Y*
0.93%
10Y*
2.02%

MOAT

1D
0.88%
1M
3.57%
YTD
-0.07%
6M
-0.05%
1Y
15.51%
3Y*
11.79%
5Y*
8.20%
10Y*
13.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SHYD vs. MOAT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SHYD
VanEck Short High Yield Muni ETF
0.74%5.58%4.85%2.39%-9.11%4.04%1.56%7.55%3.26%4.89%
MOAT
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
-0.07%13.20%10.73%31.89%-13.66%24.12%14.84%34.79%-1.28%23.18%

Correlation

The correlation between SHYD and MOAT is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.15

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2014

0.05

Over the past year, SHYD and MOAT have become more correlated (0.25) than their long-term average of 0.05, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SHYD vs. MOAT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHYD
SHYD Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
SHYD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHYD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHYD Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
SHYD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHYD Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

MOAT
MOAT Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
MOAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOAT Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
MOAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOAT Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHYD vs. MOAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Short High Yield Muni ETF (SHYD) and VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SHYDMOATDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.67

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.19

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

1.25

+1.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.17

3.90

+4.27

SHYD vs. MOAT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHYD Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is higher than the MOAT Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHYD and MOAT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SHYDMOATDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.80

1.12

+0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

0.45

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

0.72

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.78

-0.52

Drawdowns

SHYD vs. MOAT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHYD drawdown since its inception was -31.22%, smaller than the maximum MOAT drawdown of -33.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHYD and MOAT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SHYDMOATDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.22%

-33.31%

+2.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.17%

-12.43%

+10.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.17%

-21.44%

+17.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.32%

-23.96%

+10.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.22%

-33.31%

+2.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.39%

-3.88%

+3.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.03%

-3.83%

+0.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.66%

3.98%

-3.32%

Volatility

SHYD vs. MOAT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VanEck Short High Yield Muni ETF (SHYD) is 0.84%, while VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF (MOAT) has a volatility of 3.86%. This indicates that SHYD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MOAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SHYDMOATDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.84%

3.86%

-3.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.93%

9.88%

-7.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.00%

13.85%

-10.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.37%

18.18%

-12.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.69%

18.68%

-8.99%

SHYD vs. MOAT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SHYD has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than MOAT's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

SHYD vs. MOAT - Dividend Comparison

SHYD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.51%, more than MOAT's 1.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MOAT
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
1.36%1.36%1.37%0.86%1.25%1.08%1.46%1.31%1.79%1.07%1.17%2.13%
SHYD
VanEck Short High Yield Muni ETF
3.51%3.50%3.16%2.99%2.66%2.56%3.05%3.19%3.17%3.11%2.97%3.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


SHYD and MOAT have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MOAT has higher volatility (3.86%) compared to SHYD (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHYD dropped -31.22% vs MOAT's -33.31%.

On 10-year performance, MOAT leads with 13.40% vs 2.02% for SHYD. On fees, SHYD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, SHYD has been the lower-risk option at 0.84%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, MOAT has performed better with a 13.40% return vs 2.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SHYD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for MOAT.

SHYD has the higher dividend yield at 3.51%, compared with 1.36% for MOAT.

SHYD is categorized as Municipal Bonds, while MOAT is Large Cap Blend Equities. SHYD tracks Bloomberg Municipal High Yield Short Duration, while MOAT tracks Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SHYD and 0.47% for MOAT.

SHYD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SHYD and MOAT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer