PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SHYD vs. JMUB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SHYD vs. JMUB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Short High Yield Muni ETF (SHYD) and JPMorgan Municipal ETF (JMUB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHYD achieves a 0.74% return, which is significantly lower than JMUB's 1.26% return.


SHYD

1D
-0.09%
1M
0.48%
YTD
0.74%
6M
1.44%
1Y
5.37%
3Y*
4.40%
5Y*
0.93%
10Y*
2.02%

JMUB

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.56%
YTD
1.26%
6M
1.53%
1Y
6.12%
3Y*
3.91%
5Y*
1.23%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SHYD vs. JMUB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SHYD
VanEck Short High Yield Muni ETF
0.74%5.58%4.85%2.39%-9.11%4.04%1.56%7.55%1.47%
JMUB
JPMorgan Municipal ETF
1.26%4.34%1.88%5.96%-7.43%1.58%4.98%8.37%2.81%

Correlation

The correlation between SHYD and JMUB is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2018

0.41

The correlation between SHYD and JMUB shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (all time) to 0.52 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SHYD vs. JMUB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHYD
SHYD Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
SHYD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHYD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHYD Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
SHYD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHYD Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

JMUB
JMUB Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
JMUB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMUB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMUB Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
JMUB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMUB Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHYD vs. JMUB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Short High Yield Muni ETF (SHYD) and JPMorgan Municipal ETF (JMUB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SHYDJMUBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.57

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

2.40

+0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.17

8.37

-0.20

SHYD vs. JMUB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHYD Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the JMUB Sharpe Ratio of 2.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHYD and JMUB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SHYDJMUBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.80

2.56

-0.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

0.37

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.74

-0.48

Drawdowns

SHYD vs. JMUB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHYD drawdown since its inception was -31.22%, which is greater than JMUB's maximum drawdown of -12.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHYD and JMUB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SHYDJMUBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.22%

-12.50%

-18.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.17%

-2.55%

+0.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.17%

-4.79%

+0.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.32%

-12.06%

-1.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.39%

-0.59%

+0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.03%

-2.51%

-0.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.66%

0.73%

-0.07%

Volatility

SHYD vs. JMUB - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Short High Yield Muni ETF (SHYD) and JPMorgan Municipal ETF (JMUB) have volatilities of 0.84% and 0.86%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SHYDJMUBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.84%

0.86%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.93%

1.83%

+0.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.00%

2.40%

+0.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.37%

3.33%

+2.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.69%

4.14%

+5.55%

SHYD vs. JMUB - Expense Ratio Comparison

SHYD has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than JMUB's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

SHYD vs. JMUB - Dividend Comparison

SHYD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.51%, less than JMUB's 3.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JMUB
JPMorgan Municipal ETF
3.60%3.52%3.50%3.20%2.16%1.94%2.13%3.66%0.45%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SHYD
VanEck Short High Yield Muni ETF
3.51%3.50%3.16%2.99%2.66%2.56%3.05%3.19%3.17%3.11%2.97%3.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


SHYD and JMUB have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JMUB has higher volatility (0.86%) compared to SHYD (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHYD dropped -31.22% vs JMUB's -12.50%.

On 5-year performance, JMUB leads with 1.23% vs 0.93% for SHYD. On fees, JMUB is cheaper at 0.18% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, JMUB has performed better with a 1.23% return vs 0.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JMUB is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SHYD.

JMUB has the higher dividend yield at 3.60%, compared with 3.51% for SHYD.

They also come from different issuers: VanEck and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for SHYD and 0.18% for JMUB.

JMUB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SHYD and JMUB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer