SHYAX vs. CCLFX
Compare and contrast key facts about SEI Institutional Managed Trust High Yield Bond Fund (SHYAX) and Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund (CCLFX).
SHYAX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Jan 11, 1995. CCLFX is managed by Cliffwater. It was launched on Mar 6, 2019.
Performance
SHYAX vs. CCLFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SHYAX vs. CCLFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHYAX SEI Institutional Managed Trust High Yield Bond Fund | -1.84% | 7.59% | 7.60% | 10.70% | -13.31% | 9.07% | 5.36% | 4.78% |
CCLFX Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund | 0.96% | 8.93% | 12.62% | 12.66% | 2.32% | 10.38% | 8.73% | 2.12% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SHYAX achieves a -1.84% return, which is significantly lower than CCLFX's 0.96% return.
SHYAX
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -2.47%
- YTD
- -1.84%
- 6M
- -0.82%
- 1Y
- 4.87%
- 3Y*
- 6.85%
- 5Y*
- 2.92%
- 10Y*
- 5.54%
CCLFX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 0.96%
- 6M
- 3.09%
- 1Y
- 7.64%
- 3Y*
- 10.90%
- 5Y*
- 8.92%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SHYAX vs. CCLFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SHYAX has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than CCLFX's 3.42% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SHYAX vs. CCLFX — Risk / Return Rank
SHYAX
CCLFX
SHYAX vs. CCLFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Institutional Managed Trust High Yield Bond Fund (SHYAX) and Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund (CCLFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SHYAX | CCLFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.30 | 8.00 | -6.70 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.85 | 16.02 | -14.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 5.88 | -4.59 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.49 | 16.71 | -15.22 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.70 | 101.68 | -95.98 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SHYAX | CCLFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.30 | 8.00 | -6.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 | 5.17 | -4.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.04 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.24 | 4.54 | -3.29 |
Correlation
The correlation between SHYAX and CCLFX is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
SHYAX vs. CCLFX - Dividend Comparison
SHYAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.10%, less than CCLFX's 10.37% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHYAX SEI Institutional Managed Trust High Yield Bond Fund | 8.10% | 8.69% | 7.48% | 10.58% | 12.96% | 5.19% | 7.50% | 6.05% | 7.51% | 6.90% | 7.06% | 7.34% |
CCLFX Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund | 10.37% | 10.47% | 11.27% | 10.96% | 3.96% | 7.03% | 6.90% | 0.61% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
SHYAX vs. CCLFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SHYAX drawdown since its inception was -38.15%, which is greater than CCLFX's maximum drawdown of -3.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHYAX and CCLFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SHYAX | CCLFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.15% | -3.91% | -34.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.20% | -0.46% | -2.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.68% | -2.25% | -13.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.12% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.65% | -0.09% | -2.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.05% | -0.16% | -2.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.84% | 0.08% | +0.76% |
Volatility
SHYAX vs. CCLFX - Volatility Comparison
SEI Institutional Managed Trust High Yield Bond Fund (SHYAX) has a higher volatility of 1.35% compared to Cliffwater Corporate Lending Fund (CCLFX) at 0.32%. This indicates that SHYAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CCLFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SHYAX | CCLFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.35% | 0.32% | +1.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.48% | 0.65% | +1.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.84% | 0.97% | +2.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.74% | 1.74% | +3.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.34% | 1.89% | +3.45% |