PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SHY vs. SCHQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SHY vs. SCHQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHY) and Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHY achieves a 0.43% return, which is significantly lower than SCHQ's 0.57% return.


SHY

1D
0.07%
1M
0.11%
YTD
0.43%
6M
0.60%
1Y
2.87%
3Y*
4.10%
5Y*
1.75%
10Y*
1.62%

SCHQ

1D
0.19%
1M
2.15%
YTD
0.57%
6M
0.44%
1Y
4.14%
3Y*
-0.70%
5Y*
-5.55%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SHY vs. SCHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
SHY
iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF
0.43%4.95%3.92%4.16%-3.88%-0.71%3.03%0.11%
SCHQ
Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF
0.57%5.50%-6.44%3.43%-29.44%-4.86%17.73%-4.20%

Correlation

The correlation between SHY and SCHQ is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2019

0.61

The correlation between SHY and SCHQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.61 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SHY vs. SCHQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHY
SHY Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
SHY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHY Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
SHY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHY Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHQ
SCHQ Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
SCHQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHQ Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHQ Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHY vs. SCHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHY) and Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SHYSCHQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.09

+0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.24

0.59

+2.65

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.62

1.46

+11.15

SHY vs. SCHQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHY Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is higher than the SCHQ Sharpe Ratio of 0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHY and SCHQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SHY vs. SCHQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHY drawdown since its inception was -5.71%, smaller than the maximum SCHQ drawdown of -46.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHY and SCHQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SHYSCHQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.71%

-46.13%

+40.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.89%

-7.01%

+6.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.97%

-17.65%

+16.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.71%

-40.93%

+35.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-5.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.31%

-36.18%

+35.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.52%

-26.43%

+25.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.23%

2.84%

-2.61%

Volatility

SHY vs. SCHQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHY) is 0.50%, while Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF (SCHQ) has a volatility of 2.07%. This indicates that SHY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SHYSCHQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.50%

2.07%

-1.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.01%

6.07%

-5.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37%

8.65%

-7.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.99%

14.49%

-12.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.57%

15.29%

-13.72%

SHY vs. SCHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SHY has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHQ's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SHY vs. SCHQ - Dividend Comparison

SHY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.68%, less than SCHQ's 4.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHQ
Schwab Long-Term U.S. Treasury ETF
4.74%4.54%4.58%3.79%2.88%1.69%1.51%0.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SHY
iShares 1-3 Year Treasury Bond ETF
3.68%3.81%3.92%2.99%1.30%0.26%0.94%2.12%1.72%0.98%0.71%0.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


SHY and SCHQ have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SCHQ has higher volatility (2.07%) compared to SHY (0.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHY dropped -5.71% vs SCHQ's -46.13%.

On 5-year performance, SHY leads with 1.75% vs -5.55% for SCHQ. On fees, SCHQ is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, SHY has been the lower-risk option at 0.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SHY has performed better with a 1.75% return vs -5.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHQ is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for SHY.

SCHQ has the higher dividend yield at 4.74%, compared with 3.68% for SHY.

SHY tracks ICE US Treasury 1-3 Year Index, while SCHQ tracks Bloomberg U.S. Long Treasury Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SHY and 0.03% for SCHQ.

SHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SHY and SCHQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer