SHV vs. VNLA
SHV (iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF) and VNLA (Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SHV is a Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE Short US Treasury Securities Index, while VNLA is a Ultrashort Bond fund tracking the FTSE 3-Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SHV returned 3.33%/yr vs 3.80%/yr for VNLA. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SHV charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.23%/yr for VNLA.
Performance
SHV vs. VNLA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
As of year-to-date, both investments have demonstrated similar returns, with SHV at 1.47% and VNLA at 1.47%.
SHV
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- 1.47%
- 6M
- 1.74%
- 1Y
- 3.90%
- 3Y*
- 4.63%
- 5Y*
- 3.33%
- 10Y*
- 2.23%
VNLA
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 1.47%
- 6M
- 1.85%
- 1Y
- 4.77%
- 3Y*
- 5.75%
- 5Y*
- 3.80%
- 10Y*
- —
SHV vs. VNLA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHV iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF | 1.47% | 4.21% | 5.12% | 5.04% | 0.94% | -0.10% | 0.81% | 2.36% | 1.72% | 0.67% |
VNLA Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF | 1.47% | 5.45% | 6.41% | 6.09% | -0.17% | -0.18% | 3.01% | 4.43% | 0.02% | 2.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between SHV and VNLA is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2016 | 0.24 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SHV vs. VNLA — Risk / Return Rank
SHV
VNLA
SHV vs. VNLA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHV) and Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF (VNLA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SHV | VNLA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +11.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +133.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 53.77 | 3.62 | +50.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 431.38 | 11.20 | +420.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2,419.80 | 57.58 | +2,362.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SHV | VNLA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.49 | 7.60 | +11.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 11.62 | 3.67 | +7.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 8.09 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 4.50 | 2.10 | +2.40 |
Drawdowns
SHV vs. VNLA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SHV drawdown since its inception was -0.45%, smaller than the maximum VNLA drawdown of -4.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHV and VNLA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SHV | VNLA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.45% | -4.49% | +4.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.01% | -0.43% | +0.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.03% | -0.49% | +0.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -0.39% | -1.76% | +1.37% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -0.45% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.02% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.03% | -0.23% | +0.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.00% | 0.08% | -0.08% |
Volatility
SHV vs. VNLA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF (SHV) is 0.05%, while Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF (VNLA) has a volatility of 0.16%. This indicates that SHV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VNLA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SHV | VNLA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.05% | 0.16% | -0.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.12% | 0.46% | -0.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20% | 0.63% | -0.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.29% | 1.04% | -0.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.28% | 1.42% | -1.14% |
SHV vs. VNLA - Expense Ratio Comparison
SHV has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than VNLA's 0.23% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SHV vs. VNLA - Dividend Comparison
SHV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.83%, less than VNLA's 4.78% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHV iShares 0-1 Year Treasury Bond ETF | 3.83% | 4.09% | 5.02% | 4.73% | 1.39% | 0.00% | 0.74% | 2.19% | 1.66% | 0.72% | 0.34% | 0.03% |
VNLA Janus Henderson Short Duration Income ETF | 4.78% | 4.84% | 4.97% | 3.95% | 4.35% | 1.67% | 1.21% | 3.13% | 2.43% | 1.79% | 0.08% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SHV and VNLA have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VNLA has higher volatility (0.16%) compared to SHV (0.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHV dropped -0.45% vs VNLA's -4.49%.
On 5-year performance, VNLA leads with 3.80% vs 3.33% for SHV. On fees, SHV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, SHV has been the lower-risk option at 0.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, VNLA has performed better with a 3.80% return vs 3.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SHV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.23% for VNLA.
VNLA has the higher dividend yield at 4.78%, compared with 3.83% for SHV.
SHV is categorized as Government Bonds, while VNLA is Ultrashort Bond. SHV tracks ICE Short US Treasury Securities Index, while VNLA tracks FTSE 3-Month U.S. Treasury Bill Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Janus Henderson. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for SHV and 0.23% for VNLA.
SHV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (19.49 vs 7.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SHV and VNLA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer