SHRY vs. AVDV
SHRY (First Trust Bloomberg Shareholder Yield ETF) and AVDV (Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SHRY is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg Shareholder Yield Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while AVDV is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund actively managed by Avantis. SHRY is passively managed, while AVDV is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, SHRY returned 8.22%/yr vs 14.12%/yr for AVDV. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SHRY charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for AVDV.
Performance
SHRY vs. AVDV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SHRY achieves a 5.11% return, which is significantly lower than AVDV's 16.89% return.
SHRY
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -1.30%
- YTD
- 5.11%
- 6M
- 6.89%
- 1Y
- 8.24%
- 3Y*
- 14.22%
- 5Y*
- 8.22%
- 10Y*
- —
AVDV
- 1D
- 0.63%
- 1M
- 3.88%
- YTD
- 16.89%
- 6M
- 21.27%
- 1Y
- 44.33%
- 3Y*
- 28.33%
- 5Y*
- 14.12%
- 10Y*
- —
SHRY vs. AVDV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHRY First Trust Bloomberg Shareholder Yield ETF | 5.11% | 7.29% | 17.27% | 17.47% | -14.21% | 30.50% | 11.86% | 8.03% |
AVDV Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF | 16.89% | 49.37% | 8.67% | 16.85% | -11.47% | 15.80% | 5.01% | 12.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between SHRY and AVDV is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 27, 2019 | 0.68 |
Over the past year, the correlation between SHRY and AVDV has dropped to 0.42 - well below their long-term average of 0.68, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
SHRY vs. AVDV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
SHRY
AVDV
Financial Services
Technology
Communication Services
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
SHRY
AVDV
Technology
SHRY
AVDV
Communication Services
SHRY
AVDV
Energy
SHRY
AVDV
Consumer Defensive
SHRY
AVDV
Healthcare
SHRY
AVDV
Industrials
SHRY
AVDV
Consumer Cyclical
SHRY
AVDV
Basic Materials
SHRY
AVDV
Real Estate
SHRY
-
AVDV
Utilities
SHRY
-
AVDV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SHRY vs. AVDV — Risk / Return Rank
SHRY
AVDV
SHRY vs. AVDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Bloomberg Shareholder Yield ETF (SHRY) and Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SHRY | AVDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.77 | 2.87 | -2.10 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.16 | 3.80 | -2.65 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.52 | -0.38 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.13 | 3.55 | -2.42 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.13 | 14.45 | -11.32 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SHRY | AVDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 | 2.87 | -2.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.82 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.81 | -0.20 |
Drawdowns
SHRY vs. AVDV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SHRY drawdown since its inception was -36.67%, smaller than the maximum AVDV drawdown of -43.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHRY and AVDV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SHRY | AVDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.67% | -43.01% | +6.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.20% | -13.19% | +5.99% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.34% | -14.17% | -1.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.94% | -28.08% | +4.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.92% | -0.62% | -2.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.04% | -6.78% | +1.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.61% | 3.24% | -0.63% |
Volatility
SHRY vs. AVDV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Bloomberg Shareholder Yield ETF (SHRY) is 2.41%, while Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV) has a volatility of 4.93%. This indicates that SHRY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SHRY | AVDV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.41% | 4.93% | -2.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.46% | 13.06% | -5.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.74% | 15.61% | -4.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.67% | 17.30% | -1.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.19% | 19.73% | -1.54% |
SHRY vs. AVDV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SHRY has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than AVDV's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
SHRY vs. AVDV - Dividend Comparison
SHRY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, less than AVDV's 2.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVDV Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF | 2.72% | 3.05% | 4.31% | 3.29% | 3.17% | 2.39% | 1.67% | 0.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SHRY First Trust Bloomberg Shareholder Yield ETF | 1.68% | 1.73% | 1.76% | 1.49% | 1.52% | 0.98% | 1.65% | 1.54% | 1.89% | 0.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SHRY and AVDV have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AVDV has higher volatility (4.93%) compared to SHRY (2.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHRY dropped -36.67% vs AVDV's -43.01%.
On 5-year performance, AVDV leads with 14.12% vs 8.22% for SHRY. On fees, AVDV is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, SHRY has been the lower-risk option at 2.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, AVDV has performed better with a 14.12% return vs 8.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
AVDV is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for SHRY.
AVDV has the higher dividend yield at 2.72%, compared with 1.68% for SHRY.
SHRY is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while AVDV is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for SHRY and 0.36% for AVDV.
AVDV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SHRY and AVDV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer