PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SHOC vs. USFR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SHOC vs. USFR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF (SHOC) and WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SHOC achieves a 81.69% return, which is significantly higher than USFR's 1.78% return.


SHOC

1D
1.74%
1M
15.76%
YTD
81.69%
6M
81.47%
1Y
152.44%
3Y*
56.12%
5Y*
10Y*

USFR

1D
0.00%
1M
0.29%
YTD
1.78%
6M
1.89%
1Y
3.97%
3Y*
4.72%
5Y*
3.70%
10Y*
2.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SHOC vs. USFR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
SHOC
Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF
81.69%49.91%16.74%61.97%-1.79%
USFR
WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund
1.78%4.23%5.47%5.18%0.91%

Correlation

The correlation between SHOC and USFR is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.16

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2022

-0.09

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SHOC vs. USFR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SHOC
SHOC Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
SHOC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SHOC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
SHOC Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
SHOC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
SHOC Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

USFR
USFR Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
USFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
USFR Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
USFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
USFR Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SHOC vs. USFR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF (SHOC) and WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SHOCUSFRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-10.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-45.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

13.24

-11.64

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

10.51

200.29

-189.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

37.16

775.73

-738.57

SHOC vs. USFR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SHOC Sharpe Ratio is 4.40, which is lower than the USFR Sharpe Ratio of 14.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SHOC and USFR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SHOC vs. USFR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SHOC drawdown since its inception was -37.54%, which is greater than USFR's maximum drawdown of -1.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHOC and USFR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SHOCUSFRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.54%

-1.36%

-36.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.59%

-0.02%

-14.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-37.54%

-0.06%

-37.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-0.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.44%

-0.15%

-7.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.12%

0.01%

+4.11%

Volatility

SHOC vs. USFR - Volatility Comparison

Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF (SHOC) has a higher volatility of 17.00% compared to WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund (USFR) at 0.08%. This indicates that SHOC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USFR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SHOCUSFRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.00%

0.08%

+16.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.12%

0.19%

+27.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.93%

0.27%

+34.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.86%

0.40%

+35.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.86%

0.78%

+35.08%

SHOC vs. USFR - Expense Ratio Comparison

SHOC has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than USFR's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

SHOC vs. USFR - Dividend Comparison

SHOC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than USFR's 3.91% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
SHOC
Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF
0.13%0.23%0.35%0.65%0.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
USFR
WisdomTree Floating Rate Treasury Fund
3.91%4.15%5.17%5.12%1.78%0.01%0.40%2.08%1.67%1.03%0.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


SHOC and USFR have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SHOC has higher volatility (17.00%) compared to USFR (0.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SHOC dropped -37.54% vs USFR's -1.36%.

On 3-year performance, SHOC leads with 56.12% vs 4.72% for USFR. On fees, USFR is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, USFR has been the lower-risk option at 0.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, SHOC has performed better with a 56.12% return vs 4.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USFR is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for SHOC.

USFR has the higher dividend yield at 3.91%, compared with 0.13% for SHOC.

SHOC is categorized as Semiconductors, while USFR is Government Bonds. SHOC tracks Bloomberg US Listed Semiconductors Select Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while USFR tracks Bloomberg U.S. Treasury Floating Rate Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Strive and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for SHOC and 0.15% for USFR.

USFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (14.65 vs 4.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SHOC and USFR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer