SHOC vs. TMYY
SHOC (Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF) and TMYY (GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSM ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SHOC is a Semiconductors fund tracking the Bloomberg US Listed Semiconductors Select Index, while TMYY is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares. SHOC is passively managed, while TMYY is actively managed. Their 0.68 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. SHOC charges 0.40%/yr vs 1.07%/yr for TMYY.
Performance
SHOC vs. TMYY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SHOC
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- -7.69%
- 6M
- 32.26%
- YTD
- 46.90%
- 1Y
- 85.23%
- 3Y*
- 40.54%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 44.63%
TMYY
- 1D
- 0.50%
- 1M
- -0.33%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.25M | $1.87M | $2.57M | |
| $102.16K | $81.61K | $79.59K |
SHOC vs. TMYY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
SHOC Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF | 19.33% |
TMYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSM ETF | 12.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between SHOC and TMYY is 0.68, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 14, 2026 | 0.68 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SHOC vs. TMYY — Risk / Return Rank
SHOC
TMYY
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SHOC vs. TMYY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF (SHOC) and GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSM ETF (TMYY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SHOC | TMYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.29 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.55 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SHOC vs. TMYY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SHOC drawdown since its inception was -37.54%, which is greater than TMYY's maximum drawdown of -6.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SHOC and TMYY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SHOC | TMYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.54% | -6.95% | -30.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.20% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.54% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.15% | -3.40% | -15.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.59% | -1.44% | -6.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.11% | — | — |
Volatility
SHOC vs. TMYY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SHOC | TMYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.48% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 34.09% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.12% | 19.72% | +20.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.87% | 19.72% | +17.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.87% | 19.72% | +17.15% |
SHOC vs. TMYY - Expense Ratio Comparison
SHOC has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than TMYY's 1.07% expense ratio.
Dividends
SHOC vs. TMYY - Dividend Comparison
SHOC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.14%, less than TMYY's 22.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SHOC Strive U.S. Semiconductor ETF | 0.14% | 0.23% | 0.35% | 0.65% | 0.24% |
TMYY GraniteShares YieldBOOST TSM ETF | 22.80% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SHOC and TMYY have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SHOC is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SHOC is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for TMYY.
TMYY has the higher dividend yield at 22.80%, compared with 0.14% for SHOC.
SHOC is categorized as Semiconductors, while TMYY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Strive and GraniteShares. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for SHOC and 1.07% for TMYY.
Find the right allocation for SHOC and TMYY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer